<p>
You are a human being, correct?</p>
<p>
You are a human being, correct?</p>
<p>
That’s why you’re my hero.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
^ Yes, that’s true (in theory).
</p>
<p>
By the way, though 200 hours is possible in theory
</p>
<p>There are 168 hours in a week…</p>
<p>^ Well, the idea was that you could be doing two activities simultaneously.</p>
<p>Oh, fair enough. That’s still stupid. Any activity important enough to matter to Harvard is too important to devote half your attention to.</p>
<p>^ Unless you’re silverturtle. But he’s too much of a man to multitask on his ECs without then dividing his total multitasked hours in half.</p>
<p>
Oh, fair enough. That’s still stupid. Any activity important enough to matter to Harvard is too important to devote half your attention to.
I’m well aware both how many hours there are in a week and how ECAs are important to Harvard I was just having a quick quip with silver there.</p>
<p>i think they do random checks or if the interviewer sees you don’t know what your research project was about or what the firm you worked for did. </p>
<p>there’s ways for them to find out but i doubt most people who do very minimal additions get caught.</p>
<p>Yeah, I’m sure the majority of people who get in with incorrect info didn’t really “falsify” information in the way we’re thinking–I bet, however, there are a lot of people who sort of embellished things (I’m Editor in Chief of the paper, not just one of many “editors,” or I tutor for like 80 min/wk but I’ll fudge it up to 2 hours–that sort of thing).</p>
<p>
There are 168 hours in a week…
</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>