<p>People and schools say they want “diversity” but when it comes down to it, people tend to flock to others w/ the same cultural experiences and interests and the schools change their rationale for diversity when it comes to the admissions process.</p>
<p>Lets’ face, people of “like-kind” (doesn’t have to be race or ethnicity, tho it is usually the driving factor) tend to associate together b/c it’s comforting (that’s just human nature), esp if there is signifcant nos. to support such sub-groups.</p>
<p>For smaller schools like LACs, there is usually more interaction b/c there ususally isn’t a large enough minority pop. base.</p>
<p>Asian students tend to stick together (w/ the exception of the so-called “bananas”, “twinkies”, “whitewashed”, etc. who usually don’t want anything to do w/ other Asians and only associate w/ whites), blacks students tend to stick together, non-white Hispanic students tend to stick together, etc. (blacks and Hispanics also have their own version of the so-called "whitewashed, but generally to a lesser extent).</p>
<p>Now, if there is a big enough pop. base for these groups, they would often associate in smaller subgroups - such as Chinese students hanging out with only other Chinese students, black students w/ recent ties to Africa hanging out w/ others like them as opposed to African-Ams w/ generational ties to the US, etc.</p>
<p>Depending on how large or small these groups are, they can split or combine: such as students of Indian and Pakistani descent combining if they don’t have the nos. alone or Chinese-Am students generally not associating w/ Chinese students from China (usually depends on the person’s upbringing as “American”, 1.5er or “FOB”).</p>
<p>And yes, whites “self-segregate” as well; they just think they don’t b/c they have a “token” minority or 2 within their group and really, the said minority (often an Asian) is culturally mainstream America (basically “white”).</p>
<p>This “integration” is almost always a one-way street. </p>
<p>How many whites really integrate themselves into another sub-culture/social group where they aren’t the dominant group?</p>
<p>I mean really, how much “diversity” is there when say, all the Asian students at a school are “whitewashed” and culturally the same as the white students?</p>
<p>Now, of course, these are fairly broad generalizations and there are always exceptions. </p>
<hr>
<p>And school admissions boards speak on both sides of their mouths when they promote “diversity” on campus.</p>
<p>On the one hand, they defend the disproportionate % of black immigrant students from Africa and the Carribean by arguing (cultural) diversity and then (purportedly) limit the % of Asian students by using the same (cultural) diversity card when (1) many of the Asian-Am students they admit are “whitewashed” (2) admit an overwhelmingly no. of Asian students of Chinese, Korean and Indian descent and (3) aggressively pursue foreign students from China, Korea and India while basically not doing much to pursue Asian immigrant students (particularly of other Asian ethnicities such as Hmong, Laotian, etc.).</p>
<p>So basically:</p>
<p>blacks from diff. cultural backgrounds = good.</p>
<p>Asians from diff. cultural backgrounds = not that interested.</p>
<p>(hmmm - could this just be a bogus argument to justify filling a “diverse” class w/ the students who have the highest test scores?)</p>
<p>And really, if these schools wanted more diversity - wouldn’t they want more non-Jewish white students as well? (Jewish students make up a disproportionate % of many of the top schools, much more so than Asians.)</p>
<p>And it’s not like schools don’t ever differentiate btwn non-Jewish whites and Jews; schools like USC and Vandy have specifically targeted Jewish students in order to increase their student body academic profile (it’s not like Jewish students were underrepresented in comparison to the general pop.).</p>