<p>What’s next in this thread- a discussion of successful pick-up lines?</p>
<p>Hmmm… it was a “friend” looking at SD/SB profiles on their ipad on the web, awcntdb. Riiiiiggght… Sure… that’s believable… :)) </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Jym, try to think it through. I didn’t have them hopping into the sack immediately, they could converse in the park for months. He may have struck up a conversation just because she was there, or they were both feeding the ducks, people do. Why not talk to attractive people, even for no ulterior motive? An old guy in the park can only talk to unattractive young women? </p>
<p>Jym, assuming you are over 50 - are you sexually attracted to people 20-30 years younger than yourself? Are you a creep, or not?</p>
<p>This discussion is really creepy, sorghhum. Put it back and do something respectable.</p>
<p>post #239, my post was refer to post #232 where it mention on CC. I could put a picture of myself as Angeline Jolie, who can verify?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>A small compromise for the sake of love.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>This shows exactly how much perspective and context matters. </p>
<p>It is not that he had no direction. He just did not have a direction that was compatible to what the female wanted or considered desirable for her. It is not like that female has some carte blanche on what is the right direction. Their life visions were just different. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>With development admits so small, the percentage chances of that are too small to even thing about. Either way, she was hot and still is. </p>
<p>There are more developmental admits at those top schools than elsewhere. Several of my classmates had famous last names.
One college tour we attended at a top LAC was led by a girl who acknowledged she was there because she was 3rd generation, never set foot in the library or the science building, and when we entered it she gleefully proclaimed that she could see her boyfriends dorm from it. :(( </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Haven’t you ever had private, off-line conversations with other CC posters? I have. And many of them have shared their real identities with me. </p>
<p>I’m guessing if you’re the right kind of “worldly gentleman,” it wouldn’t be terribly hard as a “parent” to meet a student here on CC. Especially if the parent is willing to disclose verifiable Ivy/elite connections.</p>
<p>What a mental image that conjures up, Lucie!! Creepy guys trolling for young co-eds on cc!! </p>
<p>Well, @jym626, it had never even occurred to me before I started this thread! As I said, 230 (now 250) posts later OTOH . . . </p>
<p>Why do I feel like I want to wash my hands after typing on the keyboard…</p>
<p>“It is not that he had no direction. He just did not have a direction that was compatible to what the female wanted or considered desirable for her.”</p>
<p>Nah, he really had no direction. I was there. He was pretty lost about what to do with his life, what to study, where to live, etc. I think he viewed it as a problem he was trying to figure out.</p>
<p>I’m still friends with both, and they are both happily married to other people.</p>
<p>Back to the collegiate SB issue:</p>
<p>It seems that people are ignoring the fact that college coed SBs are attracted to SDs for the same reasons as the Sd. is to her, i.e., the SB does not want a standard relationship either. </p>
<p>And the SD-SB relationship is a way to have the company of men without the rigamarole of a college-based relationship with a college guy. </p>
<p>One thing the girls all say at dinners and events is that is it nice to around guys who do not act like idiots. I get that, as I have never met an immature SB; at least not in my world. </p>
<p>Think about this difference as compared to the college world: guys get their chairs; guys stand up when they come to the table or leave the table; no one uses foul language around them (except for the occasional adult joke); no one is throwing up; no one is using drugs; no one is getting drunk to the point of useless etc. The coed SBs just want a different environment all around, and the SDs provide an avenue to that. And it seems double worthwhile to the SBs, as they get the environment they why want, while getting enriched a bit at the same time. </p>
<p>
How many SB’s do you personally know? And how?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Understood. </p>
<p>However, that is the exception, not something that can be translated to SDs or to most men. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>@jym626, awcntdb runs in very high social circles and doesn’t seem to have a need to exaggerate these things. I think I know who he is but have no interest in outing him on a public forum.</p>
<p>I’m very old-fashioned, and somewhat oblivious, when this topic comes up so feel no need too participate in the discussion.</p>
<p>Well thats a rather intriguing post, magnetron…</p>
<p>Of course SBs are not stupid. Why bites the hands that feed you?</p>