<p>I kill gangsta’s. Like 18 year olds</p>
<p>I kill pedophiles, like 58 year olds. . .</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Murder should be illegal because it’s harmful to the progression of society. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Based on? </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Why not? No one would say anything about a 15 year old and 20 year old, why the hypocrisy? Since when has there been a upper age limit? </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>My justification is, it isn’t harmful to society. In the same way we kill animals, I don’t see why we should be able to have sex with them, if we wish to.</p>
<p>
Is it? Murder in certain cases could contribute to a competitive society, which sounds like what a libertarian would be in favor of. Why does it harm society? What kind of society? What is society based upon?</p>
<p>
By virtue of their sentience and life.</p>
<p>
Florida has one, actually. It’s interesting. Age of consent is 18, but any two participants between 16 and 23 are fine. Though it gets kind of odd when 15-18 isn’t allowed, but 16-23 is.</p>
<p>
So killing some animals for food means that we can treat them however we like? Animal cruelty, then, is obviously not a concern for you.</p>
<p>You never answered me; would you be okay with not voting? With being imprisoned indefinitely, if that particular action made society run a little smoother? Is anything that benefits your society okay? Lebensraum?</p>
<p>
What about laws to prevent cruelty to animals?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Animals can only be killed legally for commercial purposes only I think. Just as poaching and hunting for pleasure is cruel, bestiality is cruel. (It can’t be anything more than pleasure, can it?)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>In certain cases, being the operative words. For example, if someone was to kill me because his family has been kidnapped and as part of the ransom he had to kill me, he shouldn’t be jailed for killing me considering if I (and most people) were in such a situation, we’d kill the person that we were asked to kill. It harms society for obvious reasons. If you legalize murder, people will end up killing one another endlessly for no reason. A society should be based on utilitarianism. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Doesn’t really answer much. Two questions. How did you come to the conclusion that by the virtue of their sentience and life, they should be entitled to innate rights? And, are you against the killing of any animals? </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Do you agree with it? </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Lol at the reference. And I’m a utilitarianist so yes. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>We don’t need to kill animals. We kill animals for pleasure. Why shouldn’t those who are sexually attracted to animals, have sex with them for pleasure? And, what’s worse murder or rape?</p>
<p>^So are you support animal cruelty?</p>
<p>Animals just don’t know how to take a joke</p>
<p>Is bestiality pleasurable for animals?</p>
<p>Just wondering</p>
<p>Oh and isn’t the way we raise and kill animals for food cruel?</p>
<p><a href=“Investigation Reveals Cruelty at Pig Factory Farm - YouTube”>Investigation Reveals Cruelty at Pig Factory Farm - YouTube;
<p>Why do we need to improve society? What is your basis for believing this?</p>
<p>But humans have been eating animals since its start. Animals eat animals. Should be tell a lion to be a herbivore?</p>
<p>^Stupid argument is stupid.</p>
<p>I know. It was meant to be an argument. Like who makes a good argument at 3 in the morning.</p>
<p>I always make good arguments.</p>
<p>That’s in your opinion, but it isn’t a fact. So you think you always make good arguments</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I guess I do. Do you eat animals? Have you ever killed a animal intentionally because it was irritating you (insects included)? Answer, yes to any and so do you.</p>
<p>
Lawl, and I called toxic’s argument stupid.</p>
<p>
…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t get what you’re saying. Are you implying my argument is stupid?</p>