Good morning. I just want to clarify what I meant by a “high-level” program as its not at all cut and dried, and is often more studio-specific than school-specific, which makes it even trickier and less useful as a term
In my comment, when I add the distinction of looking for evaluation from a high-level teacher at a high-level program, I kinda meant assessing same as follows, which can be difficult for parents without a musical background, but which musical students seem to “know” to some extent from exposure at camps, competitions, etc.
- does the program attract talented players nationally, or is it more “regional” in its student composition?
- is the program or its instructors well known/respected among musicians in its/his/her specific discipline?
- in the case of music school associated with unversities, does the music school itself seem to be well-supported as an institution…eg. Commitment to well-maintained facilities, robust programming, attractive to well-regarded professors, etc.?
- in terms of fit, does the school actually offer a program suited to the musician…this becomes germane with electric bass guitar…eg. Some jazz programs may or may not have an element suited to contemporary/pop proclivities.
No single aspect necessarily represents a high level program, nor a fit for the student musician, and there are lots of gems hidden away that aren’t necessarily well-known nationally.
Among jazz and band students/teachers in my area (Midwest/Michigan) UNT is well-known and regarded, as is Jacobs (Indiana). And of course, University of Michigan. Each is highly competitive in terms of auditions/admit. NIU is not well-known here, which doesn’t mean its not a great program but may mean its more regional in its nature. That is not to say it couldn’t have the best up and coming percussion department around, and my own ignorance could be at fault here.
The other reasons those three programs might be better known here in the Midwest is that they have robust programs with larger student bodies (though I think its safe to say those three are well-known on a national level too.)
So in my case, some of the most meaningful information i gleaned back when my son was a sophomore came from a prof who had an award-winning clinic at the regional university but also was a sessional studio instructor at Michigan. Another useful source of assessment was a summer camp prof who’d been at one time the head of the state band and orchestra association. Each had had a reliable amount of experience in a larger field to help assess my son’s suitability to programs.
That’s the kind of help I was thinking you’d benefit from - to an extent.
But at the end of the day, there just isn’t a formula for who will be successful where. Back in the day, my son’s side jazz ensemble was populated by some pretty talented peers, some of whom pursued music in college. Who got in where among those kids and other band friends was kind of fascinating to me, and not especially predictable.
(eg one got into Oberlin but not Michigan; one got into Northwestern, but not Michigan, my own son got into Michigan but had felt himself the weakest of the group…another one went entirely regional and he was the one I expected to go to the furthest afield because I pictured him at New School, etc.)
I hope that gves you a frame of reference.