<p>Interesting list. I can think of things to like about all of those schools. BU is the only one that doesn't really rock my boat, but that's only because it lacks the self-contained campus that I would tend to favor.</p>
<p>The most "academically-oriented" schools on your list are:</p>
<p>Mudd
Swarthmore
Rice
Hopkins</p>
<p>By that, I do not mean that the other schools aren't excellent, but that these four are places where professors push hard and the students expect it. I wouldn't consider any of the four unless you expect to work hard in college. </p>
<p>These are also the four schools that are most math/science oriented, at least in terms of math/science PhDs. Mudd, a pure math/science tech school, is obviously very lop-sided. Rice leans heavily math/science in terms of PhD production. It's hard to peg Swarthmore as leaning any particular direction -- it's very strong in social sciences, but also has a lot of emphasis on hard sciences and engineering.</p>
<p>Duke and Emory are the most pre-professional of the schools on your list, but are very different. Both produce more lawyers and MBAs than PhDs. Emory, to me, is synonomous with Atlanta. Booming sunbelt on a very fast growth curve. Maybe a little too "preppy, designer handbag" but a very positive campus atmosphere, a lot of diversity, and a wonderful location tightly integrated into the Atlanta community (business, CDC, etc.). </p>
<p>UNC-CH is, IMO, the quintessential public state university. Something for pretty much everybody. Has great collegiate atmostphere. I really liked it a lot. </p>
<p>I think the least "enjoyable" college experiences would probably be at Rochester and Hopkins. Poor Rochester, it's not the school's fault. It just happens to be in a place that is hell during the winter. Hopkins is notoriously not a "warm, fuzzy" place. </p>
<p>Rice and Swarthmore both generate lots of love from their students. They have the two highest per student endowments of the schools on your list and are extremely pleasant, comfy places. Of course, Houston and suburban Philly are quite different.</p>
<p>Vassar is pretty similar to Swarthmore in terms of its campus, but with an "artsier" tilt and without the hard-core academics. </p>
<p>I don't know Occidental, but it is incredibly diverse and has a great track record academically. I've heard nothing but good things about Macalaster, but just don't know it well enough to comment.</p>
<p>For your short descriptions, I can handle Swarthmore:</p>
<p>Socially: Academic/geeky, unpretentious style, very diverse with interaction among groups, uncommon sense of community, friendly. Strong social conscience traditions.</p>
<p>Physical: "Country-club" idyllic setting, surrounded by gardens and foliage. The campus is stunning. Small campus feel. Located in an old, tree-lined suburb, inside the beltway -- half a mile from a mall, 11 miles by train from campus to downtown Philly.</p>