<p>When you cited SAT’s above, is that CR + Math, or CR + Math + Writing?</p>
<p>If you’re referring to just the 2 tests, 1190 and 3.5 GPA UW are NOT dealbreakers. They’re just kinda,flat. But acceptable, if you look up the schoolwide average SAT scores in some of those schools. </p>
<p>As long as your stats get you past the front door of general college admission, they green light and send over your supplementary arts materials to the actual department for deep consideration on the portfolio or artistic supplement submissions.</p>
<p>THere’s some back-and-forth between those two reviews, but by then, it’s the portfolios they are weighing, not whether someone else got 3.7 to your 3.5. </p>
<p>Sure, higher grades are always better but, for majors in the arts, they won’t make up for if they don’t see anything much in your artistic potential. </p>
<p>If you want to make films, you have to become much more stubborn and unrealistic than this post. :D</p>
<p>If the whole thing seems too impossible right now, you could step back and consider making a college list with some schools (reach) to pursue filmmaking and other schools with the more general academic approach (English and film studies, but some EC clubs and courses where you get to make films). It’s a two-pronged approach, but it’s another form of making up a list of “safeties” to do that. Film schools are so competitive that I think there should be some non-film schools on everyone’s list, too, no matter how talented, because those majors are competitive. </p>
<p>Have you looked at Ithaca College in upstate NY; I recall it a bit more affordable. It’s a very creative place. As well, there’s SUNY at Purchase – the arts magnet campus for State Univ of New York, for a good price (instate or OOS), but uber-competitive at the portfolio level, same as the other film schools you’ve listed.
A little gentler in competition, but still a very creative place, is SUNY at New Paltz.
Those would be affordable at OOS prices, with New Paltz easier to get into than Purchase if youwant to study the arts.
Emerson in Boston has some merit grant money, although I got the impression somehow that they were seeking candidates with higher academics; could be wrong, just my sense of it from their written materials.</p>
<p>Here’s another one, brand new: look up Ball State University in the middle of Indiana. David Letterman (alum) just gave a huge amount of money to his alma mater so they’d build a media arts center, shiny new, with a hands-on approach.</p>
<p>Onscreen, the Media Studies center for Ball State building facility and production equipment looked beautiful. Perhaps, as a State University, it would be accessible financially for your family. Don’t worry about the name; Letterman’s made it his trademark.</p>
<p>You mentioned Iowa; if you mean Ames, Iowa, they are nationally famous for their graduate creative writing program, some say #1 for it. So check around more on the undergraduate level to see how they approach their English major. </p>
<p>See also what’s at North Carolina School for the Arts.</p>
<p>Remember that there are some filmmakers who never went to film school, too, but came at it from other directions. For example, documentary filmmaker Ken Burnes graduated from Hampshire College, and he simply did films all the time as campus projects in a very open kind of school that didn’t hem him in. When he started out, there was hardly anything called a film department, anywhere; he just kind of did it. Maybe he was a history major, not sure. He specializes in documentary films, and you’ve seen them perhaps on PBS. Must be around 60 by now, so yes, there is more training out there than in those days. I’m just mentioning it because it’s possible to come to filmmaking later, and from a different base, than just going to film school startng at age l8.</p>