<p>I agree that IB and AP vary from school to school so I shall bore you with an unnecessarily long post that reiterates some of the things Nalcon, illuminar and mollypockets have said (This teaches me to read to the last page of a thread before writing an excessively long, quasi-passionate response!):</p>
<p>As an example, my district offers IB at one of its three 11/12 high schools. However, that particular school doesn't offer a lot of different IB classes (they're all taught with AP, by the way); in subject area six, the only options are Computer Science, Art and an extra core class. They don't have some of the classes you've all mentioned: Philosophy (aside from Theory of Knowledge), Cultures & Belief, Business, etc. The program is somewhat new and really underdeveloped. Although kids at that school are allowed to take AP classes as well, there isn't a real benefit to entering the IB program. For me, there are two additional fallbacks to doing IB: (1) at my high school, discounts are offered on AP exams; (2) I'd have to transfer.</p>
<p>The quality of teaching/learning in AP and IB classes can't be generalized. Where I am, AP isn't about regurgitating material. This has a lot to do with the caliber of the teachers at your district. It looks like some of you IB students are basing your assumptions on AP exams. While I agree that writing, analysis and critical thinking are better than rote memorization, I don't think it's fair to say that AP is rote just because most exams include a multiple choice section. When it comes to learning, AP is not necessarily rote; IB is not necessarily amazing and mind-opening. At a lot of schools, of course, IB is a fantastic option; so is AP.</p>
<p>My point is this: A lot of the things you've all been discussing in the way of teaching/learning styles aren't general truths; they're unnecessary generalizations. So if you're picking between AP and IB, talk to someone who's been through the programs at your school -- not random, bickering people on the Internet.</p>
<p>To answer the OP's question: The difference between IB and AP has a lot to do with college credit. If you're going to college outside of the US, IB might be a good idea. It's an established international program. However, it does have added (some would say restricting) components: CAS hours, an extended essay and requirements to take classes and pass exams in every subject area. Everything else can be largely affected by the quality of your local programs. Usually, IB includes more writing. And AP can be offered at all grade levels, not just 11th and 12th grades.</p>
<p>And, awaiting-college, (if my opinion counts for anything) I don't think Jman has come across as "really arrogant". I just don't see why you think that. All he's saying is that AP is more flexible (Even if IB students have choices within subject areas, you have to admit that not all students want to take courses in all areas, even if they have options. There are some kids who are amazing at social studies but useless at the natural sciences, and those people might want to take all the history, government and economics classes without having to bother with advanced science. The choice between Biology and Chemistry doesn't mean much in those cases.) and that he doesn't need international credit if he's staying in the States. Do you think that Americans (or people from any other country, for that matter) are without "respect" if they choose to attend college in their home country? "Internationalism" isn't sacrificed if you do AP and go to a US college. I don't think people are automatically ignorant if they aren't surrounded by foreign students or if their curriculum was developed in their own country. What's wrong with that?</p>
<p>I wrote way too much. Sorry for any mistakes; I didn't proof-read.</p>