<p>and why?</p>
<p>PRO
1.more "freedom"</p>
<p>CON
1. away from famliy</p>
<p>pro instate: cheaper</p>
<p>con oos: more expensive (even in-state private vs OOS private... more traveling costs)</p>
<p>and the Pro oos?</p>
<p>Lol... I don't know about anybody else but being away from my family would be a pro.</p>
<p>OOS:
Pro
New experiences in a different climate
Can be better than a particular person's in-state schools</p>
<p>Con
Traveling expenses
$$$</p>
<p>If you can afford out and you jive with the school, I'd suggest you go out-of-state. It never hurts to expand your horizons.</p>
<p>This is all very subjective. If you LOVE where you live then going out-of-state would not appeal to you.
If there is a school out-of-state that is MUCH better then any school that you can get into or that is available in-state then you should consider going out-of-state.
There a simply MORE options if you consider all of the schools in the country.
I went out of state because I loved a certain out-of-state school but I still love California and I visit often.</p>
<p>this is a stupid thread.</p>
<p>I think it really depends on what schools are available instate. If I lived in California, I would stay in-state. However, since I live in Nevada, I only have a choice between UNR and UNLV making out-of-state schools a more desirable choice.</p>
<p>Lol. Even stupider is wasting your own time on a stupid thread just to point out its stupidity.</p>
<p>This thread is not stupid, but it is extremely subjective and primarily based on the particular person's residency and circumstances.</p>
<p>depends on what state your in. big difference between UC Berkley and, say, ASU.</p>