Inside Medicine. What Are You Seeing? [COVID-19 medical news]

New study from VHA data:

68.4% age 65+, 8.2% female, 70% high risk comorbid conditions, 9.6% immunocompromising conditions.

All boosted (Px2, Mx2, or Jx1 primary series, followed by booster).

Of those who got breakthrough COVID-19 (1.25% of the total cohort), it looks like about 0.6% of the non-high-risk patients were hospitalized or died, while 7.7% of the high-risk patients were hospitalized or died. However, different groups of high-risk patients had very different outcomes; those with immunocompromising conditions had by far the highest risk, which high-risk comorbid conditions elevated risk by a much greater degree than being age 65+.

Of the different vaccines, a combination of the J&J and an mRNA vaccine appeared to have the lowest rate of hospitalization with COVID-19 pneumonia or death. For the rate of hospitalization with severe COVID-19 pneumonia or death, J&J x2 was slightly better than a combination of J&J and an mRNA vaccine, although the sample sizes were small. However, J&J x2 had the highest rate of breakthrough infections overall while combination of J&J and an mRNA vaccine had the lowest. For the mRNA vaccines, the Moderna vaccine appears to be more effective than the Pfizer vaccine, with mixed mRNA vaccines in between.

First appointment of the day is my strategy, if I can get it.

Also, I wear an N95 mask, always. I consider my medical appointments/checkups as not optional. Blood donation? Optional. In-person volunteering? Optional.

3 Likes

In the medical places I’ve been in HI, mask wearing is still required. Unfortunately I see multiple medical staff members wearing masks incorrectly (below nose or on chin and mostly mere surgical masks rather than more protective n95 or kf94.

I am still limiting my exposure as I, H, my mom and D are very high risk of getting a bad case of Covid. We also have the Enovid antiviral spray and use it when we have been exposed to folks that may have a virus.

Vaccine diversity for the win?

The recent VHA study found the following rate differences by vaccines:

Breakthrough infection: Jm/JP/MMJ/PPJ < MMm/MMP/PPm < PPP < JJ

Hospitalization or death: Jm/JP/MMJ/PPJ < MMm/MMP/PPm < JJ < PPP

Hospitalization (severe) or death: JJ/Jm/JP/MMJ/PPJ < MMm/MMP/PPm < PPP

2 Likes

YLE writes about myocarditis after mRNA vaccines and viral infections:

Summary of what is known and not known about long COVID, including links to some studies:

New preprint about new variants:

(Note: CoronaVac is an inactivated whole virus vaccine. 3V below refers to 3 doses of this vaccine.)

Some of the more concerning new variants:

  • XBB: very low neutralization even after 3V plus infection by BA.1, BA.2, or BA.5.
  • BQ.1.1: very low neutralization even after 3V plus infection by BA.1 or BA.2. Low neutralization even after 3V plus infection by BA.5.
1 Like

CDC COVID Data Tracker indicates that while BA.5 is still the largest variant in the US, BQ.1.1, BF.7 (BA.5.2.1.7), and BQ.1 are growing.

3 Likes
2 Likes

That seems to have a pay or login wall.

Is it referring to this?

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2208343

Not sure that I want to register to read this article.

Today my husband and I received our boosters. He got Pfizer and I got Moderna, no idea why really. We were happy with either.

Does the article say that Moderna is better than the Pfizer vaccine? Or just that the new booster is very effective?

Text of article:
Coronavirus Resource Center.

WASHINGTON, DC ― The updated Moderna bivalent COVID-19 vaccine that targets the original virus and the Omicron variant was superior to the original COVID booster in adults aged 18 and older, new results indicate.

The bivalent booster was superior regardless of age and whether a person had previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Additionally, no new safety concerns emerged.

Spyros Chalkias, MD, senior medical director of clinical development at Moderna, presented the data on Thursday at the Infectious Disease Week (IDWeek) 2022 Annual Meeting.

In the phase 2/3 trial, participants sreceived either 50 µg of the bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 (25 µg each of the original Wuhan-Hu-1 and Omicron BA.1 spike mRNAs) or 50 µg of the standard authorized mRNA-1273. The doses were given as second boosters in adults who had previously received a two-dose primary series and a first booster at least 3 months before.

The model-based geometric mean titers (GMTs) ratio of the enhanced booster compared to the standard booster was 1.74 (1.49 − 2.04), meeting the prespecified bar for superiority against Omicron BA.1.

In participants without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who received updated booster doses and those who received standard boosters, the neutralizing antibody GMTs against Omicron BA.1 were 2372.4 and 1473.5, respectively.

Additionally, the updated booster elicited higher GMTs (727.4) than the standard booster (492.1) against Omicron subvariants BA.4/BA.5. Safety and reactogenicity were similar for both vaccine groups.

“By the end of this year, we expect to also have clinical trial data from our BA.4/BA.5 bivalent booster,” Chalkias said.

In the interim, last week, the US Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization for Moderna’s BA.4/BA.5 Omicron-targeting bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine in children and adolescents aged 6 – 17 years.

Also last week, Pfizer/BioNTech issued an announcement that their COVID-19 booster, adapted for the BA.4 and the BA.5 Omicron subvariants, generated a strong immune response and was well tolerated in human tests,

Pfizer/BioNTech said data from roughly 80 adult patients showed that the booster led to a substantial increase in neutralizing antibody levels against the BA.4/BA.5 variants after 1 week.

Separate Study of Causes of Severe Breakthrough Infections in Early Vaccine Formulations

Though COVID vaccines reduce the incidence of severe outcomes, there are reports of breakthrough infections in persons who received the original vaccines, and some of these have been serious.

In a separate study, also presented Thursday, researchers led by first author Austin D. Vo, BS, with the VA Boston Healthcare System, used data collected from December 15, 2020, through February 28, 2022, in a US veteran population to assess those at highest risk for severe disease despite vaccination.

Results of the large, nationwide retrospective study were simultaneously published Thursday in JAMA Network Open.

The primary outcome was development of severe COVID, defined as a hospitalization within 14 days of a confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 test, receipt of supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or death within 28 days.

Among 110,760 participants with severe disease after primary vaccination, 13% (14,690) were hospitalized with severe COVID-19 or died.

The strongest risk factor for severe disease despite vaccination was age, the researchers found.

Presenting author Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD, associate professor of medicine with VA Boston Healthcare System in Massachusetts, said, “We found that age greater than 50 was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.42 for every 5-year increase.”

To put that in perspective, she said, “compared to patients who are 45 to 50, those over 80 had an adjusted odds ratio of 16 for hospitalization or death following breakthrough infection.”

Priya Nori, MD, an infectious disease specialist at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, told Medscape Medical News that the evidence that age is a strong risk factor for severe disease ― even after vaccination ― confirms that attention should be focused on those in the highest age groups, particularly those 80 years and older.

Other top risk factors included having immunocompromising conditions; having received cytotoxic chemotherapy within 6 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.69; 95% CI, 2.25 – 3.21); having leukemias/lymphomas (aOR, 1.84, 95% CI, 1.59 – 2.14); and having chronic conditions associated with end-organ disease.

“We also found that receipt of an additional booster dose of vaccine was associated with a 50% reduction in adjusted odds of severe disease,” noted Branch-Elliman

Nori emphasized that, given these data, emphatic messaging is needed to encourage uptake of the updated Omicron-targeted vaccines for these high-risk age groups.

The study by Chalkias and colleagues was funded by Moderna. Chalkias and several co-authors are employed by Moderna. One co-author has relationships with DLA Piper, LLC/Medtronic, and Gilead Pharmaceuticals, and one has relationships with Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, Gilead, and Kiniksa. Nori has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

JAMA Netw Open. Published October 20, 2022. Full text

Infectious Disease Week (IDWeek) 2022 Annual Meeting: Abstracts LB750 and 788. Presented October 20, 2022.

Marcia Frellick is a freelance journalist based in Chicago. She has previously written for the Chicago Tribune, Science News, and Nurse.com, and was an editor at the Chicago Sun-Times, the Cincinnati Enquirer, and the St. Cloud (Minnesota) Times. Follow her on Twitter at @mfrellick

For more news, follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

4 Likes

Thanks so much! Appreciate it!

The second part refers to this study:

This study compares the odds of severe disease by age, pre-existing conditions, and time since vaccination.

1 Like

New bivalent shots aren’t better than the old ones, according to a new study on a small group of people by researchers at Columbia and UMich:

New Bivalent Covid Boosters Aren’t Better Than Original Shots, Study Finds - Bloomberg

Eric Topol explains. It basically acts like another regular booster.

https://mobile.twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1584647419652116481?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1584647419652116481|twgr^27b0d7fa47bb1e25013cb66e5a1c3e899254c8e1|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.welltrainedmind.com%2Findex.php%3Fapp%3Dcoremodule%3Dsystemcontroller%3Dembedurl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FEricTopol%2Fstatus%2F1584647419652116481

2 Likes

disappointing that it doesnt do any better for the BA4/BA5 .

2 Likes

Though he does say that “For now, the best defense we have against the BQ.1.1-led wave is to get a booster” in A booster is your best shot now - by Eric Topol .

1 Like

YLE comments on this study: Fall bivalent boosters: Science update round 2

Summary is that while the bivalent booster may not give a significantly different antibody response in the short term from the original booster, other studies suggest that it may result in a longer term improvement later for antibodies against the targeted variant.

4 Likes

Just talked to a friend on Zoom who is down with Covid for the third time, this time after a trip to Europe. He says he has almost no symptoms similar to his first Covid experience. He’s had various boosters, though his first shot was J & J.