<p>In the "Why Stanford" thread, one user wrote:</p>
<p>"A word of warning - Stanford seems to miss one thing: a culture of rampant and ever-present intellectual discussion. People don't want their dinner table conversations to be dominated by bull sessions on the future of the EU, the meaning of beauty or statistical methods. Not to say that the discussions don't occur, but you have to seek them out."</p>
<p>As we know, Stanford admissions makes it clear that they are looking to create a student body full of intellectual vitality. It follows that its students would be receptive to intellectual conversation and stimulation, perhaps even more so than the students at HYP whose admissions definitely don't place as much emphasis on intellectual vitality as Stanford. Then why is the "duck mentality" so notoriously rampant at Stanford? Does anyone else see this apparent contradiction between resistance to intellectualism and intellectual vitality?</p>