<p>I don’t see anything wrong with an institution only agreeing to write medical school recommendation letters for the strongest students. Your recommendation diminishes in importance if you write one for everyone. Why would you write a recommendation letter for someone you didn’t think had good chances of getting into and succeeding in medical school? The fact that they have a high acceptance rate means they are doing something right; they are selecting for the students most likely to be successful in the process.</p>
<p>Not everyone who wants to go to medical school should. There are hundreds of other careers out there.</p>
<p>To answer the OP’s question, you really can major in anything you want as long as you take all the pre-med prerequisite courses. However, if you are interested in biomedical research as well, you should probably major in a biomedical field (biology or chemistry; maybe physics if you are interested in medical physics; or computer science if bioinformatics appeals to you). If you’re interested in social/behavioral science research in health and medicine, then you might want to choose a social science field (anthropology, sociology, psychology). There’s also research into health/medical economics and policy (political science or economics could be good here).</p>
<p>However, the ability to diagnose diseases and sicknesses and cure them is something I admire and strongly wish to have</p>
<p>There are several other medical professions that do that. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants also diagnose and prescribe medication for general diseases. Dentists and optometrists do this for their respective body systems; psychologists do this in psychology (although they aren’t really curing, but with the prevalence of chronic illnesses many doctors don’t “cure” either); physical and occupational therapists do similar things in their own fields.</p>
<p>Also, people often say that research universities are best for research, but it depends on the individual student. Sometimes undergraduates can get involved in top-notch research, but often at a research university the postdocs and grad students are doing the really cutting-edge stuff in the lab and the undergrad RAs are doing support tasks (important, but not the most fun). Also often the postdocs and the grad students are the ones who are supervising undergrad RAs - I know that’s the setup in my lab and most of my department’s labs. However, LAC professors - especially professors at the top LACs - are expected to do research, too, and they are expected to use research as a teaching tool for undergraduates. They supervise undergrads directly, and undergrads get to do more of the important/core tasks for the research. Plus you get used to the small collegial department, close relationship with professors, and small seminar-style classes that are common at both LACs and grad programs. LAC graduates are actually overrepresented in PhDs in science. I also got a national fellowship for my research and felt very confident in my abilities at an LAC, and I’m at an Ivy League grad school.</p>
<p>I’m not saying that LACs are better than RIs, just that I don’t want students who are grad school-bound to rule out LACs by mistakenly thinking they can’t get great research experience and into top-notch research programs.</p>
<p>Check this out: <a href=“http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/Programs%20and%20Opportunities/cech_article.pdf[/url]”>http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/Programs%20and%20Opportunities/cech_article.pdf</a></p>