Interesting article about financial aid and what "need aware" will mean at Carleton

If a student is on the fringes of admissibility, applying for FA could indeed work against them. That’s what the 15% need aware statistic is all about. Most of the class is admitted need-blind, but as the class fills up, ability to pay is factored in. Whether, at that point, they are looking at the AMOUNT of your need, is anybody’s guess.

Also, be forewarned that “need-blind” is becoming a bit of doublespeak. Strictly speaking, and this is how the colleges themselves view it, it means that as they rate the application, financial ability does not factor in. What is not so widely known is that the colleges have many techniques to stack the deck toward families who can pay full fare. Do some googling to hear what college presidents and financial aid staffers have to say about it.

Some techniques used are:

  • Heavy recruiting at private schools
  • Focusing recruiting on certain “wealthy” zip codes
  • I didn’t quite get this one myself, but one college moved their revisit day earlier because that attracted “the best”–those with a conjunction of high GPA, high SAT’s, and high class rank–a constellation which is highly correlated with wealth.
  • Favoring legacies, who tend to have more wealth
  • Not being need-blind for wait listers, transfers, or international students, and not feeling a need to disclose that

There was an interesting article by Macalester’s president from a few years ago about their financial predicament, and according to him, Mac was way lower on all kinds of student spending vs. Carleton, except FA. So his concern was that although they had this generous FA policy, they were working their way to providing all students a substandard education. http://www.macalester.edu/qualityaccess/letter.html

There is nothing inherently wrong with recruiting students from families that can pay in full. If this type of recruiting is done correctly, it can allow more money to be spent on financial aid for lower and middle income students.

Recruiting is certainly part of the discussion. I don’t remember this being part of the article in question.

It also looks like policies to improve financial aid are the the trend right now, and these issues regularly make it into the online papers. A recent NYtimes article discusses how both University of Washington and University of Chicago recently announced major improvements in their financial aid. Carleton’s policy change was announced in April 2014. It is interesting and great to know that Carleton was ahead of the pack in changing this policy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/16/upshot/washington-university-aims-to-attract-low-income-students.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=0

The above article also links to a couple more NYtimes articles comparing Carleton and many other universities and colleges in terms of the number of students enrolled receiving Pell grants.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/09/upshot/top-colleges-that-enroll-rich-middle-class-and-poor.html?abt=0002&abg=0

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/09/09/upshot/09up-college-access-index.html?abt=0002&abg=0

13% of Carleton students receive Pell grants. While this is not the worst or even close to the worst of the bunch, it is is the bottom half of the schools listed. Also, Carleton will no longer have University of Chicago and University of Washington to compare to. I’d like to see this number improved.