<p>I have to have a humanities teacher and a math/science teacher. The humanities one is already under way. The math/science is the problem, and it is possible that other people face a similar problem. </p>
<p>I had a teacher sophomore year who absolutely loved me and would write a fantastic rec, but she is not at the school anymore and was only there for 2 years, and she was a sophomore teacher for Algebra II. I got a 97/100 in her class.</p>
<p>Then there is my Honors Precalc/current BC calc teacher (same person). He is a really nice guy but no offense to him, he's kind of lazy and doesn't seem like he would write something that would really stand out. He's chronically sick- low energy and seems like depression- from diabetes. I did consistently well in his class but I was not the BEST in his class. He has been at the school for 10 years. I got a 92 in precalc Honors. </p>
<p>Then there is the third option- my chem accelerated teacher from junior year (last year). This is his second year at the school but he's been teaching for a while. He is creative and in my end of year comments, he wrote some really interesting (and kind of weird) stuff on my end of year comments. I got a 91 in his class. I'll show you what I mean about the comments:</p>
<p>"__ is equipped to become a chemist, or physician, attorney, teacher, writer… Whatever it is that he dreams of becoming, __ has the intellectual assets to achieve success. What is necessary is desire and determination. Yet, if he does not choose to become a chemist, then what is the value of chemistry education? During the course of the academic year we touch upon so many topics – but beyond demonstrating short term achievement on an SAT II exam, what value of chemistry education is enduring? It’s my hope that through lessons in thermodynamics, equilibria and the like, ___ will consider that individually we are analogous to cogs in a vast natural mechanism, and that by working within the laws of nature our mental and material wealth can expand – but if we deny or ignore the laws of nature, the stresses of natural mechanisms can grind us down. My advice, ___, is to assess what you believe to be the most important natural or social challenges facing the world, then, prepare yourself to work knowingly with others in order to address the big questions facing humanity."</p>
<p>I THINK his intentions are all positive in writing this, though it may come off that I need more work ethic and determination. He has commended me in the past for a good work ethic and stuff like that. I just have to wonder if this had some implicit negativity in it. And the catch with him is that he got mad at me in the fall of Junior year about asking him if certain things would be on the test (he wanted me to just be learning for the sake of learning) but I think he must feel bad about it. Also he got mad at me for not making up a test right away in the winter when I missed it while I was away. </p>
<p>However, this guy is very creative, a thoughtful writer, and seems pretty nice. He seemed to be impressed that I "bounced back" by the end of the year. I almost ruled him out because of these possibly negative things (or could they be obstacles that I overcame to make success even better?) BUT today we walked past each other in the hall and he seemed very glad to see me and we shook hands and he greeted me with a smile, and I told him I was enjoying physics this year and he was nice. He is also aware (I think) of my out of school endeavors to a slight degree (more that the other teachers), and SEEMED to like me as a whole person, not just a student, by the end of the year. </p>
<p>Sorry this is so long, but I am facing a dilemma. He will certainly be the most creative (unique, which is a must I think) but I just don't know if I can be 100% sure that he will write a 100% positive recommendation. Is it appropriate to flat out ask him? I could really use some help. By the way, I'm applying early to MIT if that makes any difference.</p>