<p>
</p>
<p>Of course I may be wrong, but it looks like this is the view of someone most familar with middle class suburban public schools, where removing troublemakers might focus more attention on capable students and allow them more time for college prep work so they would have a better shot at the top colleges we are always talking about on this board … Schools where parents actually have the option for homeschooling, private or parochial schools.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Still Separate, Still Unequal: America’s Educational Apartheid
Jonathan Kozol/ Harper’s Magazine v.311, n.1864 1sep2005</p>
<p>Kozol has written extensively about what money does and doesn’t accomplish in various schools. A lot of people have been concerned for a lot of years about how poorly money is spent on public education. They think the problem is the system not the amount of money.</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2005/American-Apartheid-Education1sep05.htm[/url]”>http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2005/American-Apartheid-Education1sep05.htm</a> for more of this article and some of his thoughts on how this segregation hurts children in these schools.</p>
<p>Some believe when adults label children, as troublemakers not worth any teacher’s time or as stellar students capable of great accomplishments, there is a tendency for children to live up to those labels. Robert Gardner, in the preface to his book Successful Intelligence tells a story from his early childhood illustrating this idea. I wish I could link to it, but I am not very computer educated.</p>