<p>Don't you think that sheer size has something to do with it? Obviously if you just have a lot of people, you're going to have a lot of Fulbright winners. A more fair way to do things would be to assess the percentage of your student body who won.</p>
<p>Michigan has 29 Fulbrights, but Michigan has over 6,000 UNDERGRAD students PER CLASS</p>
<p>Harvard University had 24 winners while Yale University had 23
But Harvard only has a little more than 1,000 UNDERGRAD students per class.........</p>
<p>Michigan has 5-6 times as many students as Harvard does, it only has a few more Fulbright winners than harvard does.</p>
<p>I think it if fair to compare a handpicked elite and mass less restictive admissions. However feel free to compare among like groups thus the top State U's would be Michigan, Berkeley, Wisconsin.</p>
<p>Top State Universities for Fulbrights (in term of total number of recipients) would be Michigan, Berkeley and Wiscousin, according to the list/ranking.</p>
<p>but top state universities for undergrad education are Berkeley, UVA and Michigan, according to another ranking.</p>
<p>Duh. It's not even close. Smith had 14 (and has no graduate students winning any. Remember: Fulbrights are also awarded to graudate students.)</p>