<p>^On the aforementioned post Nr. 26 you have specifically stated that Columbia> Wharton.
By differentiating the two various sectors- you have committeed a fallacy.</p>
<p>Thus, I presumed that your insist on Columbia is a salient indicator that you find it to be a better business school than Wharton.</p>
<p>
This is the main fallacy in your logic.
Careful reasoning is required for this type of discussion.</p>
<p>There is no fallacy in my logic. The fallacy is derived from your insular thoughts.
Columbia as a whole is better than Wharton. Last time I checked Columbia was more than just Columbia Business School. </p>
<p>Based off your logic I was comparing apples to apples (business school to business school…incase you didn’t catch that). In fact I was comparing apples to oranges (business school vs. the whole institution…incase you still didn’t catch it).</p>
<p>You’re really bad at ■■■■■■■■. I suggest a new hobby.</p>
<p>I also suggest you find a sense of humor or at least as I previously stated get a new hobby.</p>
<p>Ok, there is more to Penn than Wharton. However, if you isolate, Wharton its better than Columbia. I think most people prbly put Wharton up there with HYPS for business. Most people would throw Columbia in with the Dartmouth-Brown-Uchicago group.</p>
<p>Just to add things to the discussion. As an Englishman, the only ones I’d heard of before I started researching applying to them were Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Cornell and Brown. </p>
<p>Actually, I had heard of Columbia but wouldn’t have been able to tell you it was an Ivy.</p>
<p>Obviously this has no bearing on how good they are, but thought I’d drop it in there.</p>