<p>can someone rate the ivy league schools in terms of science/research/medicine in order from best --> not so best</p>
<p>The people on the harvard board won't be biased.</p>
<ol>
<li>Columbia</li>
</ol>
<p>bumppppppppppp</p>
<p>Harvard/Yale/Princeton
Wharton School of Penn
Dartmouth/Columbia/Penn
Brown/Cornell</p>
<p>My opinion. Nothing more, nothing less.</p>
<p>I didn't know that Wharton even offered courses in "science/research/medicine".</p>
<p>When did I say that?</p>
<p>read the original post</p>
<p>Bleh. Alright. Just take Wharton off then.</p>
<p>I never read the whole question =/</p>
<ol>
<li>Columbia</li>
<li>Princeton</li>
<li>Harvard</li>
<li>Brown</li>
<li>Yale</li>
<li>Penn</li>
<li>Dartmouth</li>
<li>Cornell</li>
</ol>
<p>Harvard is #1 by far.</p>
<p>I think it's really dumb how people always separate out Wharton. You can't do that! Wharton is a part of Penn! I also think that it is necessary to cluster-rank. YOu can't just flat-out rank, or else no one will ever agree.Thus...</p>
<ol>
<li>Harvard/Yale/Princeton</li>
<li>Columbia/Dartmouth</li>
<li>Brown/Penn</li>
<li>Cornell</li>
</ol>
<p>However, if I were to rank:
1. Yale
2. Princeton
3. Harvard
4. Columbia
5. Dartmouth
6. Brown
7. Penn
8. Cornell</p>
<ol>
<li>columbia</li>
<li>harvard</li>
<li>yale</li>
<li>pinceton</li>
<li>dart</li>
<li>brown</li>
<li>penn</li>
<li>Cornell</li>
</ol>
<p>Qualify your putting Columbia as #1 for research/medicine/science. How is it superior to Harvard?</p>
<p>hehe oh im sorry..i didnt read the first post....hehe:)..</p>
<p>I suppose as an undergrad at Harvard, GOMBD, you will be a part of the wonderful research environment that's supposedly found there. . . . ummmm??</p>
<p>Columbia is definitely the best.</p>
<p>Cornell is in NO WAY at the bottom for science/research/medicine. It should be near the top.</p>
<p>They're. . . all at the top, really. . . . </p>
<p>but according to the purpose of this thread they can't be equals. And also according to me, because Columbia is #1.</p>
<p>Think of Cornell as near the top like the others.</p>
<p>They are not "all at the top, really" in terms of in terms of "science/research/medicine" and Columbia is certainly not "at the top." I challenge you to cite any independent source that supports either proposition.</p>
<p>Did you read my post? Apparently not.</p>