IVY's accept Greenwich, Connecticut untimed SAT scores? Why?

<p>"Lot of interesting speculation, but not any proof. If there are cases of gaming the system out there, where are they?</p>

<p>The obvious question is why for example is ETS failing to disclose the distribution chart on scores obtained by special condition test takers? How many for example have/are testing over 1500 (old scale) and 2250 new scale - a critical threshold for many elite universities and colleges?</p>

<p>Median scores by category of primary "learning disability" claimed?</p>

<p>LD time accomodated test taker percentages by geographic testing site?</p>

<p>Why are the released statistics on special condition test takers so meager?</p>

<p>Obviously, if the very entity that's controlling the necessary information needed to determine whether SAT "gaming" could be occurring - is itself failing to release this data - then that factor alone suggests there could be some gaming issues</p>

<p>Otherwise one would think ETS would be anxious to disclose these numbers</p>

<p>Greenwich, CT (30 to 50%) and Wayland, MA (12%) (among other communities) have already been indentified (at least by media sources) as having highly unusual numbers of time accomodated test takers</p>

<p>Assuming these figures are accurate, ETS could easily release numbers on communities or testing sites having similar high percentages</p>

<p>ETS claims to be interested in full disclosure - so I guess we can forward to some new statistics soon</p>