January 2010 Critical Reading

<p>Fraudulent was referring to the something advisers continually duping scientists.</p>

<p>Sentence Completion - COMPLETE</p>

<p>Debilitate/Disheartening
Progenitor/Exploit
Penchant/Locution
Bolster
Rancor
Unflappable
_______/Mitigate
Prodigy/Anonymity
Austere/Unadorned
Acute
Emotional/Literal
Cajolery/Undertake
Diversity/Unpalatable
Integral/Extinction
Steadfast
Fraudulent
Altruistic
Impromptu
Precedent For</p>

<p>Reading Questions</p>

<p>Father’s face was tender
Writer’s motto comes off as arrogant
Something wistfulness
Cards to cards - Continuous Sequence
Writing a novel Passage 1 was didactic
Father’s comparison to cowboy - Wild exuberance
Father refusal to pick up soldier - Disloyal
Example of another reason - Inexpensive motel
Father isn’t fair - Right
True writers - Genuine writers
Thieves analogy - Unaccustomed freedom
Businesses use novelty
Two authors agree that humor is not acceptable in all situations
Traveling by river vs land is different because river is unambiguous
The question from the old man was to emphasize one of the author’s points
Tunisian passage details author’s feelings of being a foreigner
Trick means feat
Author says how scientists choose to specialize in a field of study is “no matter”
Brand new shoe evokes sensory image</p>

<p>Why is it take for granted? Does anyone remember how “assume” was worded in the passage?</p>

<p>Jersey13, can you make sure that they are not experimental ones, because I had experimental and it’s really confusing for me… Also, do they have different versions of non-experimental sections, or are they all the same?</p>

<p>why the ********** would it be disloyal over irrational? It was irrational for him not to pick him up</p>

<p>@orange peel: Do you know what the word “seditious” means? Because that’s what Virgil described his father as.</p>

<p>Guys, what was the questioned for “precedented for”?</p>

<p>hey for the english there was something wrong with the langston hughes one right?</p>

<p>It was something like, a court case like this was no __________ , any decision the judges made would be a new something.</p>

<p>v No experimental section answers included v
Sentence Completion - COMPLETE</p>

<p>Debilitate/Disheartening
Progenitor/Exploit
Penchant/Locution
Bolster
Rancor
Unflappable
_______/Mitigate
Prodigy/Anonymity
Austere/Unadorned
Acute
Emotional/Literal
Cajolery/Undertake
Diversity/Unpalatable
Integral/Extinction
Steadfast
Fraudulent
Altruistic
Impromptu
Precedent For</p>

<p>Reading Questions</p>

<p>Father’s face was tender
Writer’s motto comes off as arrogant
Something wistfulness
Cards to cards - Continuous Sequence
Writing a novel Passage 1 was didactic
Father’s comparison to cowboy - Wild exuberance
Father refusal to pick up soldier - Disloyal
Example of another reason - Inexpensive motel
Father isn’t fair - Right
True writers - Genuine writers
Thieves analogy - Unaccustomed freedom
Businesses use novelty
Two authors agree that humor is not acceptable in all situations
Traveling by river vs land is different because river is unambiguous
The question from the old man was to emphasize one of the author’s points
Tunisian passage details author’s feelings of being a foreigner
Trick means feat
Author says how scientists choose to specialize in a field of study is “no matter”
Brand new shoe evokes sensory image</p>

<p>OMG. You finished the list… does this mean the inveigle was definitely experimental? That would make my day! I still probably got the motels wrong, but -1 is almost definitely an 800 right?</p>

<p>Definition of “sedition” from Merriam-Webster:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>“disloyal” was definitely the answer.</p>

<p>Can someone please explain the austere/unadorned sentence completion question? I do not remember what the sentence was, but I put plain/ornate. Thanks</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Even -2 is almost definitely 800 (~98% chance).</p>

<p>So it looks like “unaccustomed freedom” is right then, I guess. But doesn’t anyone else think it’s weird that they made an analogy to thieves rather than freed birds, as I suggested earlier…? :P</p>

<p>Was the passage about physics/Newton/Shakespeare/20 Questions experimental? If not, what was not mentioned as non-Newtonian? It was quantum physics, ? physics, cosmology, mathematics…</p>

<p>I didn’t put “inexpensive motels” for the extra example because initially they didn’t intend to go to a motel at all, so I thought that couldn’t have been a reason, so I put something to do with scenery because the dad said they will actually be able to see where they are going. I was probably wrong though, just sharing.</p>

<p>

Experimental </p>

<p>v No experimental section answers included v
Sentence Completion - COMPLETE</p>

<p>Debilitate/Disheartening
Progenitor/Exploit
Penchant/Locution
Bolster
Rancor
Unflappable
_______/Mitigate
Prodigy/Anonymity
Austere/Unadorned
Acute
Emotional/Literal
Cajolery/Undertake
Diversity/Unpalatable
Integral/Extinction
Steadfast
Fraudulent
Altruistic
Impromptu
Precedent For</p>

<p>Reading Questions</p>

<p>Father’s face was tender
Writer’s motto comes off as arrogant
Something wistfulness
Cards to cards - Continuous Sequence
Writing a novel Passage 1 was didactic
Father’s comparison to cowboy - Wild exuberance
Father refusal to pick up soldier - Disloyal
Example of another reason - Inexpensive motel
Father isn’t fair - Right
True writers - Genuine writers
Thieves analogy - Unaccustomed freedom
Businesses use novelty
Two authors agree that humor is not acceptable in all situations
Traveling by river vs land is different because river is unambiguous
The question from the old man was to emphasize one of the author’s points
Tunisian passage details author’s feelings of being a foreigner
Trick means feat
Author says how scientists choose to specialize in a field of study is “no matter”
Brand new shoe evokes sensory image</p>

<p>silverturtle, I was being sarcastic towards orange peel. :P</p>

<p>what exactly was the question for altruistic because i don’t remember that one…</p>

<p>WRITER’S ONE:</p>

<p>Meaning of assume? “your readers come in with a world of knowledge which you may assume, but you”</p>

<p>Something like that. I think I got it wrong. I put seize.</p>

<p>what was the deal with the passage about lab research? I thought that was the hardest one…</p>