<p>i had arrogant, lighthearted, tender, rancor, </p>
<p>i didn´t have wistfulness though, or the penchant one
anybody know the dad/cowboy meaning? i debated forever on that one</p>
<p>Dad/cowboy was something about enthusiasm. (A)</p>
<p>Lighthearted was the same question as wistful.</p>
<p>OK WE HAVE CONFIRMED 56/67 QUESTIONS
(although Im not surea bout the recapitulation of intro/ expansion of generalizations question)- I thought it was recaptulation…</p>
<p>WE NEED TO CONFIRM THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS…</p>
<p>why was the mutation significant? I said it was a clue to the “puzzle”</p>
<p>was the “theives” unaccustomed freedom or stealthy progress? I put unaccustomed freedom.</p>
<p>humor in workplace --was it skepticism/ hostility. I put skepticism</p>
<p>What was the purpose of the geneticist account?</p>
<p>WE NEED TO FIND THE FOLLOWING PASSAGES ON GOOGLE: FATHER AND SON PASSAGE, SCIENCE PASSAGE, HUMOR IN WORKPLACE.
IF ANYONE REMEMBERS ANY SPECIFIC SENTENCES/ NAMES OF CHARACTERS FROM THE PASSAGES, PLEASE SEARCH UP THE WHOLE SENTENCE AND NAME OF CHARACTERS ON GOOGLE. THIS WILL VERY LIKELY RETURN THE ARTICLE. </p>
<p>PLEASE POST ALL PHRASES/ SENTENCES REMEMBER FROM THE ARTICLES, SO WE CAN TRY TO SEARCH UP THE ARTICLE…</p>
<p>science passage - “JIGSAW PUZZLE” “biologist walk through park” “mutation DNA”</p>
<p>father and son passage - one of the names began with a V…</p>
<p>PLEASE COMPILE MORE INFO</p>
<p>Don’t remember what I put for the mutation one.</p>
<p>I put skepticism & unaccustomed freedom.</p>
<p>What exactly was the sentence completion that “precedent for” was the answer for?</p>
<p>does anybody remember all the possible answers to the wistfulness one? I think I put wistfulness, but I’m not 100% sure. Also, anybody remember the penchant/locutions possible answers?</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
<p>@skippppy</p>
<p>“there was no precedent for the case. they had to enter new legal grounds”</p>
<p>or something like that</p>
<p>So what do you guys think the curve will be like?
-2 = 800 or
-2 = 790?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Right, but my confusion is about the fact that they were thieves… you could basically say “unaccustomed to freedom” for anyone/anything being set free. The word “thieves” instantly made me think of “stealth”, and though there’s been an argument earlier that “with each mile, their confidence increased”, I think of “stealth” more as a descriptor of the distance they traveled, not about their mood. Ugh, actually, scratch everything; I’ll try and look up the original text.</p>
<p>what was the other answer choices for the question that had progenitor/exploit as an answer? i remember i felt like exploit had a negative connotation, but i can’t remember if i ended up choosing that one or not.</p>
<p>The way I thought of it was that they weren’t able to experience such freedom on the open road before and were thus apprehensive, and then as they grew used to it their confidence increased.</p>
<p>reposting for replies…</p>
<p>Silverturtle (and any others): I understand that “sedition” and “patriotism” clearly points to the choice “disloyal,” but doesn’t the overall theme/idea of a paragraph have to be consistent? I remember that the rest of the paragraph was about how Earl also dismissed a variety of different people (young and old, different professions, etc.) Wouldn’t that suggest a more “irrational” approach than a “disloyal” one?</p>
<p>But the question was specifically referring to the soldier, not the other people.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Any potential, implicit suggestion toward irrationality is trumped by the multiple, explicit signs that the narrator saw his father’s actions as disloyal.</p>
<p>to settle this whole irrational vs. disloyal debate. You may think that irrational is correct, and it could be, but you can’t prove disloyal wrong. I almost remember this perfectly. he said something about how he said “i don’t want to ride with a servicemen” and then the narrator said “I turned around and saw the DEFENDER OF OUR NATION kick his bag and become smaller and smaller as we drove away.”</p>
<p>@jlewis Thanks!!</p>
<p>…and what was the passage-based question that “skepticism” was for?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>OK-- but what does that have to do with thieves escaping?</p>
<p>The double passage about humor in the workplace I think.</p>
<p>and also i think apprehension was an answer. wistful has a hint of gloomy and it definitely was not at all said. I think it was apprehension because the narrator said “for the first time i thought of him something something but as a friend.” If that’s not apprehension, then i don’t know what is</p>
<p>That’s not apprehension. Apprehension is when you’re wary of something.
They were wistful because they were thinking of Virgil’s mother.</p>
<p>As for the freedom one, thieves escaping would be unused to freedom.
Can someone explain this better?</p>