<p>i noo this is prolly in the wrong place but what do you guys thing of the test
and for the question with the parallagram area did u split it up into two trianges and used the area formula of triangle</p>
<p>ya
(10 char.)</p>
<p>You could, but you couldve also done AbsinC, which yield 604 ftsqr i believe</p>
<p>this is for trig regents, yes? wat did everyone get for that question with r for negative collinear thing? i was pretty sure it was -1.07 or -0.89 but put -0.89 cuz i didnt think it could go past -1…</p>
<p>Oh my god. I found that Regents to be super hard! But then again, Math has always been my weakest subject. </p>
<p>What did you guys get for the last question? I definitely lost 6 points on that one.</p>
<p>@ Krazy the answer was def -1.09. im sure of that</p>
<p>@cgirl199 the answer to the last question part 4 was 33 degrees. </p>
<p>and for the area of the parallelogram i got around 604</p>
<p>^ that’s what some people have said, but I’ll believe it once it’s proven that r can go beyond -1 or 1. (that’s what some kid in my school said after the test was over)</p>
<p>@ Krazy yea but ur suppose to round down. -1.09 is not much over -1 and recall my having problems like that through ought the year in my class like that one. but i see ur point</p>
<p>REALLY? it was -1.09?
I had absolutely NO clue how to do that question, but I was like. “all these choices are negative except for 4, so I should pick the ones that’s different” 
And for the last question, I kept getting 4.2 until I realized I did sin80 instead of cos80 which wasted a good 15 min of me staring @ the paper. ._.</p>
<p>correlations cannot be more than or less than 1 or -1 respectively</p>
<p>i’m positive. -1 and 1 are straight lines</p>