<p>I felt really good about everything, but for 45, 46, 48, and 49 I had to make educated guesses because I ran out of time.</p>
<p>How did you guys do?</p>
<p>Remember, we can't talk about the answers until 24 hours from now, so don't.</p>
<p>Similar feeling for me. I took a few Peterson's practice tests and they wer WAAAY harder than this. Left 4 blank (38, 46, 48, 49, IIRC) but felt good about the rest. I feel guilty taking this test instead of Math IIC despite my being in Calculus BC, but well, I'm not exactly the math whiz. I just need one more decent subject test score to go along with my 760 US History...can Math IC be the one?</p>
<p>I'm glad I wasn't the only one who had to omit a couple :)</p>
<p>I heard there was a good curve in May for this test... any idea what that was?</p>
<p>Is there even a curb for the Math IC exam?
I've just been hearing that it's "so easy" that a curve is practically nonexistant.</p>
<p>Hopefully that is wrong. I skipped like 6.</p>
<hr>
<p>--Edit
That curve for the May - how's it compare to the general curves in the past?</p>
<p>So if I missed 8 questions (I don't think I did), I'd still get 700+ according to that curve, right?</p>
<p>PS. You may want to edit that problem out of your post because there are a lot of people who haven't taken the test yet.</p>
<p>I omitted seven, which is pretty good for me, lol.</p>
<p>I thought the test was MUCH easier than usual, except for #7, that triangle thing. I've never seen a question quite like that before.</p>
<p>EDIT: Removed details. =3</p>
<p>That is the curve for the Math IC exam.
Six omits would be around a 720, if you got nothing else wrong.
If you got anything wrong (an omit doesn't count as wrong), you lose 1.25 points (instead of 1 like on an omission).</p>
<p>I omitted 4 as well and was unsure on 2 of them.</p>