K-Mart Calculators, Protein Bars and Bathrooms: My SAT Experience

<p>Whether you are a die-hard fan or critic of the new SAT reasoning test, the following article from the Fall, 2006 Journal of College Admission, by Anne Richardson, is a must read.</p>

<p>"I took the SAT’s in May.</p>

<p>Now before asking what is so remarkable about this, I am a middle-aged director of college counseling at an independent, college-preparatory high school in Maine. I have listened to my fair share of complaints about the new SAT and, if truth be told, have voiced some of my own. In the interests of thorough research, I put my money where my mouth is. I duly registered for the SAT’s online, paid my $41.50, and waited for the day to arrive.</p>

<p>I won’t take the time to bore you with my experiences, squeezed into a highschool desk at 7:30 a.m. for five hours, with two five-minute breaks and one oneminute stretch. Suffice it to say, I staggered out of the building at 12:30 p.m., having learned some fundamental truths about the SAT experience:</p>

<li><p>Eating breakfast and being well-rested is essential. It’s a very, very long morning.</p></li>
<li><p>It is a real challenge to go to the bathroom and eat a snack in five minutes. This is especially true when there is only one bathroom and many female test-takers. Difficult choices had to be made.</p></li>
<li><p>No-one under the age of 25 knows how to write cursive anymore. The interval between two sections in which each of us had to write “the oath” took forever, because first everyone had to learn cursive.</p></li>
<li><p>Thinking, organizing and writing a good essay at 8:00 a.m. on a Saturday morning is a challenge, and I write for a living. Fortunately I could fall back on my own formula: the Civil Rights Movement, Mother Theresa and Huck Finn can be used in any SAT essay.</p></li>
<li><p>Understanding the question is more important than knowing the answer. Some of those questions are very, very tricky.</p></li>
<li><p>SAT vocabulary is critical. Learn those top 200 words.</p></li>
<li><p>Twenty minutes of sustained writing physically hurts. I haven’t written by hand for that long for years, and I would venture to guess the same is true for the current SAT test -taking generation.</p></li>
<li><p>The SAT is as much about stamina as it is about learning. By 11:30 a.m, I was no longer interested in the nuances between two articles about the cheetahs in Africa, nor whether x was greater than y or vice versa. I was hanging on grimly until the end.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>There were some humorous moments. Several of my students had to be picked up off the floor when they realized that I was really there to take the test and not just to watch. Others just shook their heads in amazement. My large-print, add/multiply/divide/subtract only, K-Mart calculator was challenged as illegal, because it wasn’t a graphing calculator. I had to bring that one; I don’t know how to use a TI-83. And do you know how many times a room full of SAT test-takers have to find a tissue and sharpen their pencils in a morning? It was a veritable symphony of sound.</p>

<p>Seriously, though, taking these tests is currently a fundamental and important part of American education and, having now taken the SAT myself, I am amazed by and proud of our juniors. The SAT is a long, demanding and challenging experience. It takes preparation and stamina, even more so if one has extended time. Some of those students did not leave the building until after 2:00 p.m. And then we turn around and ask our juniors to do this all over again in October.</p>

<p>As a result of my experiences in May, I am more firmly convinced than ever that the current structure of the SAT cannot provide an accurate measure of what the College Board claims to measure. The SAT is not solely “a three-hour and 45-minute test that measures critical reading, writing, and mathematical reasoning skills students have developed overtime and skills they need to be successful academically.” (<a href=“http://www.collegeboard.com%5B/url%5D”>www.collegeboard.com</a>) It is also a five-hour physical and mental test of endurance.</p>

<p>The College Board generously provides four free score reports but only when one registers for the SAT. No junior that I know has his college list so ready in March that he is prepared to send unknown scores off to colleges. I certainly wouldn’t want my scores (especially that math score) going anywhere without seeing them first.</p>

<p>Finally, I do not believe that a handwritten, formulaic 25-minute essay is an accurate measure of a student’s ability to produce a thoughtful, carefully structured, critical piece of writing. In an era of the writing process, of editing and rewriting, this is the antithesis of good writing. Yet, an awful lot now rides on this writing sample; colleges are now counting the writing score and they want access to the essays.</p>

<p>Is the SAT, in its current form, “the best independent, standardized measure of a student’s college readiness?” (<a href=“http://www.collegeboard.com%5B/url%5D”>www.collegeboard.com</a>) I don’t think so. Therefore, I now plan to do three things:</p>

<li><p>I will advocate that a graded writing sample is a more accurate measure of a student’s ability to write than the SAT essay.</p></li>
<li><p>I will continue to support the recent recommendation from NEACAC that the College Board divide this test up, so that students can choose what sections they want to take at each sitting.</p></li>
<li><p>I will urge the College Board to change its policy to provide eight free score reports at any time during the application process for each test-taker."</p></li>
</ol>

<p><a href=“http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3955/is_200610/ai_n16779698[/url]”>http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3955/is_200610/ai_n16779698</a></p>

<p>
[quote]
2. I will continue to support the recent recommendation from NEACAC that the College Board divide this test up, so that students can choose what sections they want to take at each sitting.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Americans really need to learn what college admission tests are like in other countries.</p>

<p>But what were her scores? Inquiring minds want to know.</p>

<p>In my time, in my country( USSR) the sistem of college entrance tests was very different from the american one, but we still had to take ONE subject exam a day, not THREE of them. :-)</p>

<p>Nice article! and I applaud her for actually taking the test. When I was in elementary school 40+ years ago we learned to write cursive... it was a subject, we practiced. It seems so silly to me to ask kids to write an essay with a pencil when they have been raised on a keyboard. </p>

<p>My son's SAT tutor (yes, we hired a tutor) advised him to bring unwrapped hard candy to the test. 2 hours into the test, when he felt ready to pass out, he was to reach into his pocket and silently bring out a piece of candy (avoiding the noise of unwrapping). Worked great!</p>

<p>Great article. I will have to show my D this. It sounds like she could have written it. She said most of this after she came home from her test last year, except the graphing calculater part. </p>

<p>I definitely agree with katonahmom as far as the writing section goes. My D can write well when she has the time to think about her essay and revise it as needed. When she is given a timed writing assignment, well that's another story. She says she needs to be in the mood to write and I couldn't agree with her more.</p>

<p>Wait until you have to do 8-10 hours of high pressure work a day. Every day for 30 years. And lunch is for sissies.</p>

<p>I am a student who did really well on the SAT and I definitely agree with the article on points 1 and 3. The SAT essay has atrocious scoring and other limitations. And the score-sending thing is out-and-out fleecing of students.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Americans really need to learn what college admission tests are like in other countries.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I'm glad there is no such thing in Canada. In Quebec, just the one finishing CEGEP French (or English) exam is a dumb enough thing as it is. Yeah, people can't write anymore, but writing formulaic essays in a couple of hours on subjects given on the spot ain't going to measure much or help alleviate that problem.</p>

<p>I've had to sign that stupid oath four times now (two SAT1s, two SAT2s) and each time I start out writing in cursive.... after about three words I just say "screw it" and finish writing it normally. </p>

<p>Collegeboard hasn't come after me with an axe yet so I can only assume it doesn't matter.</p>

<p>It probably doesn't really matter at all what form of handwriting you use for the attestation statement.</p>

<p>Good comment, Barrons. There are people who can easily handle the testing situation and do well; they may be a small minority, but the test is meant to differentiate the population into ability groups. If everyone could easily handle the test it would be useless for sorting out those who can manage all the stresses from those who need more ideal circumstances to succeed. The real world isn't ideal, or even fair; those who can deal with it should have an advantage.</p>

<br>


<br>

<p>Is there an actual list floating around??</p>

<p>NOt only is there a list, you can buy flash cards:
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Picture-These-SAT-Words-Flash/dp/0764179217%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Picture-These-SAT-Words-Flash/dp/0764179217&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>o man 8 free score reports would make my week</p>

<p>tokenadult, barrons and wis75 - all goods points.</p>

<p>FWIW, my S found many lists of "top" SAT vocab words available for free on the web - so it is possible to compile a good, if not comprehensive, list without having to purchase a SAT prep book or flashcards. For vocab - I do think learning style is a critical factor - my kids don't go for the cartoon pictorial flashcard/books at all and invariably opt for the more traditional list making with dictionary definition. No matter what the current top 200 words are said to be -and computer programs are often used to generate and compile lists based on past SAT tests- there is no substitution for reading because words have to be understood in terms of dictionary meaning as well as context, and syntax.</p>

<p>The OP article by Anne Richardson must be part of a concerted push for SAT reform espoused by Earlham College Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid Jeff Rickey and approximately 250 high school counselors and college admissions officials worldwide :</p>

<p>
[quote]
Rickey, himself a member of the College Board that annually administers the SAT to hundreds of thousands of college-bound high school juniors and seniors. Despite that affiliation, he is one of a group of approximately 250 high school counselors and college admissions officials worldwide who in December, following the most recent sitting for the SAT, sent a letter to College Board President Gaston Caperton requesting significant changes in SAT testing procedures.</p>

<p>Two problems concern the co-signers of the letter to Caperton, Rickey says: the length of time required to complete the exam and, especially, the Board's insistence that students hoping to improve their results on any given section of the test cannot retake just that portion but must sit again through the entire exam.</p>

<p>"It's far too long a period of time for young people to have to do it," says Rickey of the SAT's current duration - roughly four hours under normal circumstances and more than six hours (over two days) for some students with special needs. Minimal breaks and restrictions on food that students may consume while taking the test, adds Rickey, echoing a major point of the letter to the College Board president, mean individual scores may be compromised by factors such as fatigue and hunger.</p>

<p>As a group, the signers of the letter to the College Board president have suggested that the three sections of the SAT - critical-reading, mathematics, and an essay - be administered separately, contending that such a move "will benefit all of the people involved; proctors, test center coordinators, the colleges receiving the scores, and especially students."</p>

<p>If the College Board would allow students to take just a part of the test each time, Rickey says, "then theoretically they would be totally fresh for all three pieces and the resulting scores would be a better reflection on real student ability." He adds isolating the three sections also would open the door to the possibility of students wanting to try to improve specific scores being able to retake only that part or those portions of the test in which they're interested. As constituted today, the SAT requires students wishing to retake any portion of the test to retake the whole thing.</p>

<p>"Just as a hypothetical, if you have a student who racks up two 800s on the critical reading and math portions of the test but manages only a 6 [out of 12] on the essay and wants to try again, why make him or her retake the entire test?" poses Rickey; with 95 percent of colleges and universities choosing to look at a prospective student's highest scores for each section no matter how many times the test is taken, "that's just a waste of students' time," he concludes.</p>

<p>"But, unfortunately, it's what the College Board has figured out is the way to make the most money," says Rickey, who also is a member of the advisory board for The Education Conservancy, a non-profit organization established in 2004 and committed to helping students and their parents overcome "commercial interference" in the college admissions process. He says that during the College Board's transition from service organization to big business, the New York-based operation has built up "incredible surpluses" from annual revenues of "hundreds of millions" of dollars.</p>

<p>"Even though I'm a member of the College Board, speaking from this particular point of view, I can't say that I feel like much of an owner in the College Board," Rickey says. However, he is not without hope that the situation might improve.</p>

<p>Responding to a recent query on the subject by a reporter from The Chronicle of Higher Education, a spokeswoman for the College Board said the proposals made in the letter to Board President Caperton are "seriously being looked at." And another College Board official has indicated the organization's SAT Committee will discuss the matter at its next meeting in the spring.</p>

<p>For his part, though, Rickey suspects it wAs a group, the signers of the letter to the College Board president have suggested that the three sections of the SAT - critical-reading, mathematics, and an essay - be administered separately, contending that such a move "will benefit all of the people involved; proctors, test center coordinators, the colleges receiving the scores, and especially students."</p>

<p>If the College Board would allow students to take just a part of the test each time, Rickey says, "then theoretically they would be totally fresh for all three pieces and the resulting scores would be a better reflection on real student ability." He adds isolating the three sections also would open the door to the possibility of students wanting to try to improve specific scores being able to retake only that part or those portions of the test in which they're interested. As constituted today, the SAT requires students wishing to retake any portion of the test to retake the whole thing.</p>

<p>"Just as a hypothetical, if you have a student who racks up two 800s on the critical reading and math portions of the test but manages only a 6 [out of 12] on the essay and wants to try again, why make him or her retake the entire test?" poses Rickey; with 95 percent of colleges and universities choosing to look at a prospective student's highest scores for each section no matter how many times the test is taken, "that's just a waste of students' time," he concludes.</p>

<p>"But, unfortunately, it's what the College Board has figured out is the way to make the most money," says Rickey, who also is a member of the advisory board for The Education Conservancy, a non-profit organization established in 2004 and committed to helping students and their parents overcome "commercial interference" in the college admissions process. He says that during the College Board's transition from service organization to big business, the New York-based operation has built up "incredible surpluses" from annual revenues of "hundreds of millions" of dollars.</p>

<p>"Even though I'm a member of the College Board, speaking from this particular point of view, I can't say that I feel like much of an owner in the College Board," Rickey says. However, he is not without hope that the situation might improve.</p>

<p>Responding to a recent query on the subject by a reporter from The Chronicle of Higher Education, a spokeswoman for the College Board said the proposals made in the letter to Board President Caperton are "seriously being looked at." And another College Board official has indicated the organization's SAT Committee will discuss the matter at its next meeting in the spring.

[/quote]
</p>

<p><a href="http://www.collegenews.org/x5190.xml%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.collegenews.org/x5190.xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Just wanted to add (I have SAT on the brain right now - S is taking it as I write this) that I think number 5 is a winner: "Understanding the question is more important than knowing the answer. Some of those questions are very, very tricky." Maybe not "more" important but certainly just as important.</p>

<p>My S followed the advice to eat a good breakfast but he absolutely refused to take the snack I prepared because the breaks are so short there is no time for a snack ( or even for a bathroom pit stop for that matter).</p>

<p>Anyone that has to write for their job or professionally knows that the ability to leverage the computer is essential as polishing and cutting and pasting has become as much of the process as critical thought. I find it absurd to ask this generation to write "by hand" from scratch and turn that in without the countless revisions we expect as part of the modern writing process and which absolutely involves using the computer as a legitimate tool.</p>

<p>dogs, the writing -essay portion of the new SAT is basically the same as the old SAT II subject test. The essay is not supposed to be a polished piece of prose but a merely a writing sample written under pressure - and a time constraint - much like an in-class exam would be. Many colleges that put a premium on writing do want graded writing samples (Mt. Holyoke and Vasaar are two, if I am not mistaken) that show-case a students' talent. The essay has come under sharp criticism but it is also being praised in some quarters - see thread:</p>

<p><a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=257246%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=257246&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>"7. Twenty minutes of sustained writing physically hurts. I haven't written by hand for that long for years, and I would venture to guess the same is true for the current SAT test -taking generation."</p>

<p>Twenty minutes is nothing. I write by hand for a solid 43 minutes for in-class essays in English Lit or French Lit at least once a week.</p>