<p>Hey, well this year I'm planning on studying for WHAP (i take the class too), self study ap psych, ap bio, and either ap macro or micro... so which one is easier?</p>
<p>Thanks! :D</p>
<p>Depends. If you are more into math, then micro. If not, macro.</p>
<p>wait, could you please elaborate on that more?</p>
<p>^because you're gonna have some simple calculations in micro such as demand and supply stuff, whereas macro concentrates more on societal policies including foreign exchange market...
i find macro is more challenging myself, but many of my friends said micro is the harder one for them.</p>
<p>I found Macro to be harder than Micro. This is partially because both my textbook and both the review books I used sucked for explaining things like foreign exchange, and partially because I studied that after micro and crammed it into two weeks before the exam (which would be sufficient if I had a work ethic, but I don't). 5's on both, though, so I can't complain, except that I've forgotten nearly everything I learned in macro.</p>
<p>I found Macro to be much easier than Micro. Macro is a lot of graph-drawing, and a lot of picturing cause-effects. The first FRQ on the Macro exam is always a multipart one, with four subparts comprised of at least two sub-subparts each. You start with one scenario, and simply answer with a graph. As the question progresses, you use information from one graph to make another graph, and explain how changes in Graph1 affects Graph2, etc. Logic-based, and nice for people who hate calculations ;)</p>