<p>it didn’t really specify, did it?</p>
<p>for the Worchester V. Georgia, the court ruled to acknowledge the cheeroke lands (and it did not immediately cause them to evacuate) so…</p>
<p>but Jackson did not enforce the ruling…and they were consequently removed.</p>
<p>None of the other choices made sense too, I think?</p>
<p>heres why it’s trade restrictions:</p>
<ol>
<li>the question asked prior to 1763, specifically exempting the numerous taxations in the era</li>
<li>trade restrictions, namely navigation acts for mercantilism, strongly effected the colonists because they moved from legal trade to smuggling</li>
<li>inheritance laws, i.e. primogeniture, increased the population of the colonies, but did not effect them the most, and certainly not as much as navigation did to spawn a large commerce of smuggling</li>
</ol>
<p>inheritance laws is definitely correct</p>
<p>they were one of the primary motives for colonial immigration
under primogeniture laws in britian, land was automatically passed on to the first-born son, so younger siblings has no land, hence the motivation to move to the new world.</p>
<p>there was one where it said the court acknowledged their lands (never said protect or that jackson would enforce, blah, blah…so i put the acknowledging one)</p>
<p>before 1763 the colonies prospered under Britain’s policy of salutary neglect</p>
<p>yeah, i second salutary neglect</p>
<p>the national origins act favored northern and western European immigration</p>
<p>jonnnn, you are thinking too deeply into this…it was one of the questions on the first page. u might not remember the exact question too well, it was: what laws passed by great britain before 1763 effected british colonists in north america the most? primogeniture laws no doubt had a great impact on immigration, but then again, immigration was an ongoing thing and it did not dramatically alter any habits. it had a huge impact mostly on poor landless british living in BRITAIN. on the other hand, trade restrictions like the navigation acts moved the economy toward smuggling and began american colonial resentment of the british.</p>
<p>i thought because the trade restrictions (aka navigation acts) where not enforced and then it was not until after 1763 that these were enforced that the answer would have to be salutary neglect…</p>
<p>idk you could make an argument for either choice
because the primogeniture motivated the original immigration, i figure that it affect the colonies the most by spurring their creation.</p>
<p>as far is over thinking the question, that results from taking an SATII after taking an AP</p>
<p>if you want to have some real fun, check out the New York State Regents…</p>
<p>^
haha. what a flipping joke. im aiming for like 105 on that next week</p>
<p>ok so W vs. G was in 1832 and the Trail of tears (removal of cheeroke) was in 1838…that is NOT immediate</p>
<ol>
<li>South NOT – extensive canals and railroads</li>
</ol>
<p>could someone tell me the other answer choices and what the question was, i dont remember this</p>
<p>also, has anyone figured out the 90th q</p>
<p>South:
-new lands to grow cotton in (srry thats all i could remember)</p>
<p>
so why would inheritance laws bother PEOPLE WHO WERE ALREADY IN THE NEW WORLD? (lol sorry for “shouting”)</p>
<p>
LOL, there are people who are studying real hard to pass that thing u know</p>
<p>the question asked which affected the colonies the most</p>
<p>the inheritance laws motivated the colonists to emigrate from England to the Colonies</p>
<p>so if its what brought them there in the first place, than it most certainly affected them</p>
<p>obviously they impacted them, the reason people question this choice is because of relative impact</p>
<p>Think about it. It should be trade restrictions considering that the FIRST QUESTION WAS ON MERCANTILISM IN THE 17th and 18th CENTURY!!!</p>
<p>lol</p>