<ol>
<li>the war of 1812 ended the federalist party b/c of the hartford conven and talk of secession (as said in my amsco book) which means that the era of good feelings (one party) and monroe is the end of the fed reign (idk, that was my logic)</li>
</ol>
<p>for the quotes, i thought only one option had ben frank in the last spot and i cant really remember the other two b4 him now</p>
<ol>
<li>The question was something like "What caused the end of the Progressivism movement?" And the correct answer should be "foreign incident diverted people's attentions" (aka WWI). The only other answer choice I could remember was "progressive reforms were all completed and they had no reason to continue," which was what I put and got wrong.</li>
</ol>
<p>So the answer is Marbury vs Madison?
2. I also put Monroe because when i searched online, the website said that Federalism ended with the election of 1816. (i really don't know though)</p>
<p>1 and 4. I thought the feminist movement question and the 1990's pay questio were the same one.</p>
<p>The only connection I see to the MacArthur question regarding UN bases to Japan is that MacArthur commanded bases in Japan and when he was fired consequently lost power there... but I don't see how military subordination to civilians is relevant at ALL.</p>
<p>Ah okay, here's some supporting info </p>
<p>In a journal article titled "Truman or MacArthur: Who's in Command", Julie A. Miller writes ,</p>
<p>"Another point that must be considered is how much control
the civil authorities can have over a local field commander
without hampering the accomplishment of the military objectives.
Traditionally, during a total war, the civilian authorities gave
military commanders in the field greater authority to formulate
military policies to enhance operational freedom." (Truman</a> Or MacArthur: Who's In Command?)</p>
<p>In the scandal, didn't MacArthur overstep his bounds in regards to civilian authority? I guess argument A is that MacArthur overstepped his bounds by supporting the war and argument B is that Truman made MacArthur subordinate by firing him in the first place</p>
<p>mmkay, and thanks for the help with the other questions. so basically i think there's a debate to be had about the era of federalism.. also, for the progressivism question, i put that conservative critics stopped it. i guess that's not true?</p>
<p>because my book (the american promise) has a chapter: world war I: the progressive crusade at home and abroad... i figure that probably means that progressivism continued, correct me if i'm wrong. i mean i figure that harding kinda ended that with his return to normalcy and stuff</p>
<p>So was the civilians the correct answer?</p>
<p>For progressivism, im pretty sure foreign affairs took away the focus on domestic reform.</p>
<p>i have no clue about the civilian one. it could go either way. i mean, after reading up on it, it seems as if the bases in japan are more irrelevant than the answer that we put. which sucks.</p>
<p>Balls. Whatever its one question</p>
<p>do you remember the different answers for what the civil war caused?
actually i dont particularly remember the question either...</p>
<p>Yeah one was economic superiority of south (<Lol at that) and another answer was Steel production in the north soared (thats what i put)</p>
<p>i think i put the increase of steel production ^</p>
<p>wait, in the compiled list someone said something about segregation? is this a separate question?</p>
<p>Anyone have any idea how the curve for this is going to look? A conservative estimate puts me at 10 omit and 10 wrong - any idea what score this would be?</p>
<p>hmmm for the federalist era ending... emmm the Revolution of 1800 ofcs lol... which for one is important because the federalists lost power but also because it showed democracy and the exchange of power was relatively free of violence and bloodshed... if this revolition had not occured without violence the fragile republic of the US would have been dismembered from that point. Basically it showed the US was there to stay.</p>
<p>i feel like the curve won't be too high... idk does anyone know how sat 2 curves for ush usually work?</p>
<p>Procrastination- that would be a raw score of 90-10 (omitted)= 80- .25(wrong)= 80- .25(10) = 80-2.5=77.5 rounded up to 78 according to Kaplan review is a 790 =)</p>
<p>actually, that means 20 wrong, so that's a 70-2.5, right??</p>
<p>90-10= 80 for omits
80-an additional 10 for wrong= 70
etc</p>