<p>The scholars would be frustrated because they believe they have understood the Grand Theory - they believe the use of the paintings is for understanding the past.</p>
<p>The scholars basically think they have it all figured out, but people still question the whole thing - making them frustrated.</p>
<p>@dvdhsu I think the first option was the value of jazz is difficult to assess, and the second option was like it’s a difficult process to learn.</p>
<p>@JBCHUN, I don’t think the general agreement was with a quote, right? If it was do you remember the quote? I remember there was some question that asked how the author of passage 1 would reply to the last sentence in passage 2. I thought that was the general agreement question; it said that the emotional impact of the art mattered more than the identity and I put agreement because the author of passage 1 constantly talked about all the graceful lines and beauty a lot and seemed very reverent of the works.</p>
<p>yeah the scholars opposed passage 2’s views
the scholars referenced in passage 2 believed that art is the way to study history (what passage 2 was arguing against)</p>
<p>gsfan01 - Yeah that’s how I thought about the frustrated/delighted question. My only concern was that maybe the historians understood the theory on a wide scope, but wouldn’t exactly be frustrated with the 1st author saying the theory isn’t clear since they haven’t explicitly interpreted the paintings. Still think it should be frustrated though.</p>
<p>@dvdhsu
i chose the second one too which basically said that it takes dedication to learn jazz
the thing that hinted the answer to me was probably the list of activities that one must go through (which basically went on from line 6 to the end)</p>
<p>Indeed the first passage did focus on the art’s beauty, but it also called the artists the “Michaelangelos” of their time. I think the Passage 2 quote more explicitly put down the assertion that the artists’ identities were anything more than inexperienced doodlers.</p>
<p>yeah, general agreement because at the end, author 2 conceded that ultimately it was the response that the art evoked that mattered. it was very clear, i’m almost positive it was general agreement.</p>
<p>@shathdra for the cave art
the passage 1 and passage 2 did not agree with each other
and passage 1 was concerned with learning about life from the “artists” of the paintings
which mean passage 1 WAS concerned about the identity of the author - resulting in mild skepticism</p>
<p>Jazz Passage
1: Jazz education is hard to measure/Value of Jazz is difficult to assess vs. learning Jazz is a strenuous activity
2: Distinctive (vs. personal creativity)</p>
<p>Video Games passage (2 passages)
Video games can transform players
1st passage analyzed a topic and 2nd passage said it was harmful</p>
<p>Ocean Passage
Sentence was for transition</p>
<hr>
<p>Big passages</p>
<p>Whales Passage
Using similes and metaphors in writing
Bursts and smokes meant scientists put in much effort already
Mentioned all EXCEPT motivation to study whales</p>
<p>Time/space Passage
Blur between day and night
Evening schools (vs. lunch hour)
Imagery described contrast between day and night</p>
<p>Black Concert
Bears: proceeds
Dancing high schooler: exuberant (or aggressive? Or perplexing?)
Cherry blossoms: wild
Crowd of people: unrelenting force
Great migration: belonging
Waiting for lifetimes: generations
Bear most nearly means: proceed
The panorama of the city: idealized
Crowd changing: color
Endless ground : inclusiveness of society
Reference to baby kicking: Novelty of a development</p>
<p>Cave Paintings Passage
Credibility
Empathy
Aesthetic power
Beauty is eternal: reverent
Playfully careless?
Frustrated? (vs. delighted vs. sympathetic)
Mild skepticism vs. general agreement (vs. cautious acceptance)</p>
<p>Passage two definitely talked about how the art drawings were made by a bunch of teenagers. But in the end that passage made the statement so obviously he agrees with it. And for passage one, idk I felt mild skepticism, cautious acceptance, or general agreement could have worked but I chose general agreement just because I felt the author of passage 1 really discussed the impact of the art. It says ‘general’ agreement, so he doesn’t have to agree on every point.</p>
<p>@gsfan01 I really hope so lol because that’s the answer choice that I picked.</p>
<p>the question didn’t say the identity of the artist was important, it said the RESPONSE was, which author 1 implied throughout the whole thing and author 2 explicitly stated. </p>
<p>and i said hard work or whatever for the jazz one, i was between that and another one though.</p>
<p>Is everyone sure about the cherry blossoms being wild? Weren’t they describing her tears or something? I said undefined or something like that. I had wild, but changed it because I didn’t think tears would be called wild…</p>