<p>Skipblooms- personal and creative</p>
<p>aesthetic power for that one. </p>
<p>and did anyone put evening schools for the time… </p>
<p>also i put indifference… the first passage doesn’t mention the identity of artists, it focuses merely on the aesthetic value.</p>
<p>skipblookms: I went back and forth on that jazz musician question too, but I ended up settling on that it took a lot to master.</p>
<p>
I put aesthetic power, because he talked their beauty and whatnot. I found the original book herE: [The</a> Cave Painters: Probing the … - Google Books](<a href=“The Cave Painters: Probing the Mysteries of the World's First Artists - Gregory Curtis - Google Books”>The Cave Painters: Probing the Mysteries of the World's First Artists - Gregory Curtis - Google Books)</p>
<p>i put “general agreement”
despite passage 1 talking about “michaelangelo’s” and passage 2 talking about “doodles”, in the end they both concluded that the power of art itself was a moving force
passage 1 hardly talked about WHO drew them but rather about the effects of the art</p>
<p>that’s what i was thinking too, but the question didnt ask about passage 1 in a vacuum (which i would’ve put aesthetic power then), but rather asked in comparison to passage 2
passage 2 mentioned that it was drawn by teenagers and that they were doodles and would never be put in art museums
however, passage 2 never talked about the diversity of the content while the whole last paragraph of passage 1 was dedicated to the repetition of drawings</p>
<p>exactly, so he would be calmly indifferent.</p>
<p>and did anyone put evening schools for the time…</p>
<p>also i put indifference… the first passage doesn’t mention the identity of artists, it focuses merely on the aesthetic value. </p>
<p>and its hard to master since it lists all of that stuff about initiation etc.</p>
<p>for the jazz question i put master
i put aesthetic power on the cave painting ques
i put the example of evening schooling for one of them
for the cherry blossom i put wild
and i put general agreement for the relating ques, most likely got this one wrong</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>If you read the link I have above, you can see how the author talks about the “great artists” who took the time to “draw an appealing line rather than an awkward one”</p>
<p>That’s why I don’t think he would agree entirely, but with caution.</p>
<p>@nspiredone
i dont think it means that hes indifferent, rather BECAUSE he didn’t talk about who drew them but the actual power of art, he would’ve agreed that it doesn’t matter who drew them as long as its powerful art hence general agreement</p>
<p>@theimpatientone
hmmm… i see where your coming from, but i think there might not be enough evidence to indicate that even if he thought there were “great artists”, that it was important that it was they who drew them</p>
<p>stop overanalyzing.</p>
<p>I put general agreement, because it referred to the emotions people get when looking at them. </p>
<p>The answer is never “indifferent” or anything that’s extreme when talking about the authors attitude or something.</p>
<p>did you guys have reading with green chemistry
or was that experimental</p>
<p>why are you guys taling about the tests? Is this site really confidental?</p>
<p>
No. It’s COLLEGE confidential. This goes on every SAT, don’t worry about it.</p>
<p>idk… indifferent isn’t extreme… and it was talking about the identity of people that look at the paintings not emotions.</p>
<p>anyone remember anything from the 1st vocab section?</p>
<p>I bombed like all of the vocab. Was it just me or was it especially hard…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Read the passage again from [The</a> Cave Painters: Probing the … - Google Books](<a href=“The Cave Painters: Probing the Mysteries of the World's First Artists - Gregory Curtis - Google Books”>The Cave Painters: Probing the Mysteries of the World's First Artists - Gregory Curtis - Google Books). The entire first paragraph talks about artists, who were “trying to create art in our sense of the word.”</p>