<p>I vary between INTJ and ENTJ, depending on how much I like people that day.</p>
<p>Try [this</a> awesome site](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISTJ"]this”>ISTJ - Wikipedia) for all kinds of information. @dsi411</p>
<p>I got ENTP the first time I took the test (~5th grade) but flash forward and I’ve gotten INTP on every single testing since freshman year…funny how things change, isn’t it?</p>
<p>ESTJ eyyyy. I think i can be pretty domineering at times…</p>
@dancingwriter I’m an ENFP too! Interesting.
I retook it, and asked for the opinion of others close to me as well, and this time I’m pretty confident that I’m ISFP (The Artist)
@dsi411 It means:
I:Introverted
S:Sensing
T:Thinking
J:Judging
ISTJs primary cognitive functions are:
Primary: Introverted sensing (Si)
Auxiliary: Extraverted thinking (Te)
Tertiary: Introverted feeling (Fi)
Inferior: Extraverted intuition (Ne)
ISTJs are called the “Duty fulfillers” of society. They are methodical, systematic, organized, thorough, realistic, dependable, and loyal with close family. They are often the role-model “good citizen.”
@LAMuniv I think the issue is that most people are sensors who want to intuitives. For the longest te I was stuck between being an ISFP (The Artist) and an INFP (The Dreamer). INFP sounded cooler, and made me feel more special. Personality test websites seem to have a hidden bias and stereotype against sensor types describing them as concrete, practical, unimaginative (in some cases), dull, narrow-minded, shallow, and simple-minded. Overall though, of course it’s going to sound better to be the creative, visionary, forward-thinking, complex, intelligent, inquisitive, deep, and philosophical intuitive type.
However, none of these biases about sensors and intuitives are completely true. A sensor can be just as, if not moreso, intelligent, imaginitive, creative, inquisitive, artistic, complex, open-minded, philisophical, visionary, and deep.
The real difference between sensors and intuitives aren’t necessarily their personal qualities, but their learning styles. Sensors learn to apply their strengths through personal experience to become more intuitive, while intuitives learn to apply their random, sometimes unrealistic to visions to the real sensory world.