<p>Im deciding between these schools. I will probably major in physics and I want to go to med school. I wouldn't mind going to any of these schools but I have a hard time making these type of decisions so any advice is appreciated.</p>
<p>RPI: I live close by, they offered me $30,000 a year in aid, located in a stinkhole, nerds galore, not the best academics</p>
<p>Mcgill: huge student body which could be bad, good social scene, probly cost <$40,000, don't know any french</p>
<p>URoch: good advising/teaching or so i've heard, would cost about $40,000, not very well known</p>
<p>ND: relatively conservative (which I am), lot's of pre med students, very well known, good school spirit, in the middle of the mid west :(</p>
<p>Ya thats true, I guess its just weird when people talk to each other in french and I can’t understand what they’re saying, but its not something that would prevent me from going there, i shouldn’t have said that</p>
<p>hmmm, can’t rely on the school’s claims for us info hounds? It couldn’t be THAT easy ,could it?</p>
<p>I actually just got a sense of this when I read in a book recently called 75 myths of college admissions or something like this, in which it was said that colleges (regularly?) [fudge/misprepersent/skew] their numbers. I was astounded.</p>
<p>So I have asked in various threads here, but I will post as a separate thread eventuially,</p>
<p>to what extent does this skewing misrepresenting and fudging of data go on, both the incoming admissions data as well as post college data?</p>
<p>A related question I had was: is there some sort of FDA for colleges that monitor the claims by these $200,000 corporation uber-products in which there is such consumer demand? What stops, in other words, a college from making any claim it wanted - other than ethics? They certainly have the motivation and the means.</p>
<p>Is there an internal monitoring association that licenses colleges? Not as a good as a real third party outside the family…</p>