<p>I am an undergrad who likes doing research. I previously wanted to do an MD/PhD until I discovered that and MD/PhD is basically a PhD which allow a researcher the ability to get patient samples and recruit patients for studies. Although I enjoy both physician shadowing and doing research, I sort of want to devote more time to patients. I currently shadow and electrocardiologist and I love the field. I have heard that with an MD/PhD it is impossible to perform surgeries while doing research, considering that a good MD/PhD has an 80/20 (research/clinical) split and anything lower than that makes him/her a bad MD/PhD. I am considering doing an MD/MS or MD w/ research honors even though they are not as prestigious as an MD/PhD. I am willing to devote the time to the MD/PhD degree, but I want to devote a tad more time to patients. My original idea was to team up with a PhD where I could be the co-PI of the lab, who devotes more time to clinical but is also able to do research (something like a 60/40 clinical:research split), but that does not seem to be the case since most MD/PhD own their own labs and must oversee all that goes on there. I really do not want to own my own lab and deal with the pressures of grants while commanding grad students and post docs to do my bidding, but I would rather do the actual technical work. So I guess that I could potentially be allow to do that with an MD/MS, am I correct? </p>
<p>Also, if I do choose this path of an MD/MS, will it look bad if I do research during all 4 yrs of undergrad and adcoms ask me why I devoted so much time to it if I did not apply MD/PhD even though I enjoy doing it and hopefully making a new discovery that could save lives (essentially what most docs do on the operating table)?</p>
<p>Some feedback is appreciated. Thanks so much.</p>