Parentologist just wrote that the OP can get into a “second tier LAC” with her ECs.
Where is this list from? USNews has selectivity as SAT scores (5%) and percent in the top 10% of their class (2%). This list, for example, ranks Vassar and Colorado College as 12, Carleton as 15, and Middlebury as 19. However, according to the 2019-2020 CDS (since colleges have been test optional since then), the students from each college’s SAT scores for mid 50% were:
Carleton:
SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing: 670-750
C9 SAT Math: 690-790
C9 ACT Composite: 31-34
% in top 10%: 70%
Middlebury:
SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing: 670-750
SAT Math 690-780
ACT Composite: 32-34
% in top 10%: doesn’t post
Vassar:
SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing: 680-750
SAT Math: 690-780
ACT Composite: 31-34
% in top 10%: 65%
Colorado College:
SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing: 650-730
SAT Math: 650-750
ACT Composite: 29-33
% in top 10%: 82%
Middlebury does not post how many kids it has in the top 10%, Carleton has the ranks of 26%, and CC has the ranks of only 23% of their students, and Vassar has the ranks of 56% of their students.
However, even if they are, Middlebury and Carleton students have substantially higher SAT and ACT scores than Colorado College, so how exactly did Colorado score 7 rankings higher for “selectivity”? SAT scores count for 2.5X as much as class rank. Furthermore, SATs of Vassar and Carleton are the same, but Carleton has high percent of student sin the top 10%, so why does Vassar rank higher in “slectivity” than Carleton?
Admission rates for Carleton that year were 19%, for Vassar it was 23.4%, for Middlebury it was 15.4%, and for Colorado College it was 13.5%.
I see no manner in which Vassar is more selective than Carleton, yet the list claims that it is.