<p>I am admitted to MIT ,Jerome Fisher Program and Stanford. </p>
<p>Thinking of great advantages each school has, I am so confused and cannot </p>
<p>make a choice! Please Help me!</p>
<p>P.S. If anyone attending MIT..sees this thread, please give me an advise...
and.. I would like to know how the atmosphere is different...among the schools. And... how's the campus? I know Philadelphia and Sanfrancisco is beautiful.</p>
<p>OK>. I am now erasing Stanford..</p>
<p>Still confused ~</p>
<p>Philadelphia sucks. So does Penn. Go to Boston.</p>
<p>i'm not making your choice for you. [insert irked rant about people who phrase their questions as demands]</p>
<p>i know nothing about penn, except that a graduating friend from philly is now (surprised at herself, but) returning to penn. but she's in math, and a grad student. i'd argue that boston trumps pretty much anywhere, as a city with an incredible number of college students. look around, there's plenty of threads on the atmosphere (hint: work damn hard, party even harder), the campus (i don't think it's ugly here, but i also don't really care, and as noted, i like boston), and all sorts of reasons to go here; if you have more specific questions, ask, but i suggest you look around. what're you interested in studying?</p>
<p>M&T is dual business and engineering --> ranking wise #1 and #20-something, respectively</p>
<p>MIT you can dual major in sloan business and engineering very easily--> ranking wise #2 and #1, respectively</p>
<p>making your choice from pure ranking perspective, it should be simple</p>
<p>I would just say that going to Stanford because you think San Francisco is beautiful is a bit of a red herring to me. Penn is right in Philly, Boston is just a T-ride away from Cambridge, but the jaunt from Palo Alto to 'Frisco is not exactly trivial.</p>