<p>Since the moderators refuse to close or move this thread, I think it needs a moderating voice. I hope that would be me. </p>
<p>I am Jewish, I am pro-Israel, I love Israel. But to me, being pro-Israel means being pro peace. Peace can come in two forms. A viable two (or three) state solution or a fragile one state solution. While I respect Alexandre - he’s an outstanding contributor to CC- I am not impressed with Lebanon as an example of a successful multi-ethnic one state solution. Lebanon is pretty fragile, and the fragility of the ethnic balance is the reason that 4th generation Palestinian refugees have no rights and no future. No, I believe that a two state solution in Israel/Palestine is much more achievable and can lead a lasting peace (for Lebanon too, when the Palestinians are invited to move to the new Palestinian state). </p>
<p>Right now, if we ignore Gaza for a moment (that’s a whole different discussion), there still is a viable two-state solution. There is a current partner for peace in Abbas who together with Fayyed has done a remarkable job within the last year or so in restoring security to the West Bank maintaining peace, rooting out terrorist elements, and building the government infrastructure needed to govern. Even the Israeli military has been impressed with the US-trained Palestinian security forces. This was especially true during the Gaza War. Abbas has done all that has been asked of him at great political cost to himself. But you must admit that he has vision and I respect the path he has taken. Few people in the West Bank have the stomach to see their towns look like Gaza does now, and there is more hope now than I can ever remember. But the public eviction of Palestinian families in East Jerusalem is a slap in the face to all Palestinians, Abbas and his whole team especially. It is a slap in the face to the United States. It is a slap in the face of American Jews who have supported Israel in the past but can’t stay silent with such a grave injustice. It has spawned J Street which will give AIPAC a run for its money. </p>
<p>A two-state solution does involve Israel relinquishing part, not all, of East Jerusalem. Barak, Olmert, Clintion, Livini and I’m sure Obama all realized this. Netanyahu will have to. The United States has invested a lot in training the Palestinian security forces and we should not and will not tolerate a reversion back to a greater conflict in the West Bank, this time perpetrated by Israel. Clearly, Hebrew University and the surrounding neighborhood would still be in Israeli Jerusalem, and so would Gilo, the Jewish neighborhood (or settlement, what you call it is irrelevant if you know the area) of the current building controversy. In prior negotiations, the maps have been combed and gone over and with the exception of the most contentious neighborhoods near the Old City, everybody knows what the ultimate two state solution will look like. There is no doubt that the predominantly Arab neighborhoods and the Arab parts of the Old City will be in the capital of a Palestinian state. The current push by the right wingers to Judaise East Jerusalem and create facts on the ground is directly contrary to the interests of the United States, and also contrary to the interests of Israel as a Jewish State. The Palestinians will never agree to a state that excludes a certain holy site, and will likely push for a one-state solution, despite all of it’s fragility, if they perceive the two-state solution has permanently failed. Pursuing the one-state solution peacefully would highlight the apartheid conditions and would probably succeed though I don’t see that leading to the repatriation of the Lebanese Palestinians for the same reason they are unwanted in Lebanon - they would upset the fragile ethnic balance. Fayyed has even said that Jews could remain and become citizens of Palestine as the Arab citizens in Israel could remain Israeli, removing some of the most difficult practical barriers of how large numbers of people would have to move from their homes. Though this statement went largely unnoticed, it shows me a real maturing of the Palestinian team. </p>
<p>It is not pro-Israel to silently watch her commit diplomatic suicide by pursuing an agenda that gets Arab families that have lived in their East Jerusalem homes since the 1950’s evicted by a double standard. It is not pro-Israel to be silent when racist settlers throw rocks at Palestinian children and yell “whore” at Palestinian women in Hebron who have done nothing to them. There is much terrorism against Arabs by Jewish settlers going on right now and it’s no more acceptable than rockets flying into Sderot. Most Israelis, Jews and everyone else deplore these things. It is not pro-Israel to watch the Netanyahu government marginalize the best partner for peace that the Palestinians have ever produced. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>For 2500 years, this solution has been used against Jews in Palestine, Spain, Portugal, Russia, Germany and finally all over the Middle East after the creation of Israel. Since the 1949 Geneva Conventions, mass evictions of an ethinc group is an illegal war crime. Knowing our own people’s history, how can you as a Jew advocate the forcible removal of people from their homes? Even you must realize that this is not an viable option in the 21st Century. Even the United States, and even the bulk of the American Jewish community has limits on what they will tolerate from Israel. If the Palestinians remain peaceful, and if Israel continues to pursue an expansionist policy toward the West Bank perpetuating the apartheid conditions there, and continues to evict Jerusalem Palestinians than I fear a great chilling of relations between Israel and the United States. All that you say about Israel being a democracy will ring hollow. It hasn’t rung hollow quite yet because the Palestinian side has always reverted to terrorism, but Palestinians pursing their agenda peacefully is the most powerful weapon that they have. Leaving the Settler movement unchecked at the same time is surely the best way to destroy the US-Israel relationship. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t support these short-sighted divestment campaigns or targeting the Israeli academic community, of all places, (though I do support boycotting products made in the West Bank settlements), but the solution is to pursue peace not to spew racist gibberish. It’s to learn about other peoples opinions, other narratives and support constructive people who are actually working toward a solution. It’s easy to blame, it’s hard to build.</p>