<p>Inquisitive mom --</p>
<p>While I generally agree with you -- and was ready to stand up and cheer when I read your post 32 on the gifted but LD thread -- I respectfully disagree on this one for two reasons. </p>
<p>First, my sense is that there is sometimes a disconnect between Admissions and LD Services. The admissions people might not even know what services are available for LD students at their universities, and if they are not well-versed in understanding LD's and the potential achievements of LD students, they might be concerned about how well the student could do in their rigorous programs. For this reason, if an LD student's hs transcript does not reflect a problem based on the LD -- for example, if the student did badly in 9th grade before being diagnosed with the LD and receiving accommodations, dinging his GPA -- I would argue against revealing the LD in the admissions process. I don't see a benefit to the student unless there is a problem in the academic record that revealing would help neutralize, and I do see a potential downside in terms of an increased chance of rejection if the LD makes Admissions nervous.</p>
<p>Determining whether the university offers adequate support for the student to be happy there seems to me to be entirely separate from getting into the uni in the first place. </p>
<p>Second, there's the issue that whether or not a college's admissions office is LD-friendly should not, IMHO, be the determining factor in whether a college is a good fit. I think it is better for the student himself to make the determination as to whether or not the college is right for him. </p>
<p>Let's say an LD student has done very well in hs with accommodation and is qualified in terms of stats and EC's to attend selective college X. College X is the size the student wants, has a campus atmosphere the student enjoys, and is tops in the student's major. The fact that the Admissions office might have a problem admitting students with LD's, IMO, would not make that college a bad match; it would simply make the admissions office uneducated and quite possibly guilty of reaching admissions decisions based on prejudice and not in accordance with relevant laws. The student who does not reveal is not vulnerable to an Admissions office's perhaps unconscious agenda with respect to LD applicants.</p>
<p>My own kid's first choice college is reputed to be LD-friendly, although I had heard a couple of scary stories to the contrary. His academic and EC credentials were well in their range. Whether or not the admissions office was comfortable with admitting LD students, this was the place he wanted to attend. It was his decision not to reveal. This particular uni was clearly the place for him; his need for accommodations is well-documented and pretty black and white; and the kind of accommodations he needs are quite easy to provide. Had the uni denied the accommodations, we were prepared to negotiate/advocate/fight for this student to receive the educational opportunities for which his hard work and achievement in hs made him qualified. </p>
<p>To me, the issue is that LD students should have the same range of options as other similarly qualified students. I'm not suggesting that colleges should take less-qualified LD kids. But if the student is qualified and able to do the work, the fact that Admissions or anyone else doesn't want to deal with students with LD's is not an indication that the college itself is a bad fit, but only that the gatekeepers are maintaining a wrong-headed policy that must be surmounted.</p>