He spent the 2.5 days at Dartmouth Dimensions. I came to pick him up and for one meeting, described below. He was in heaven when I picked him up. The kids were so nice, he had so much fun, the Dartmouth program was spectacularly orchestrated. The kids loved, loved, loved Dartmouth. [They were beyond enthusiastic, if you catch the drift]. Students not associated with the program would stop him on the path and say, “You’ve got to come to Dartmouth. It is the greatest place in the world.” The new President, who will start next year, was Paul Farmer’s partner in starting Partners in Health and now runs the World Health Organization’s HIV/AIDS program and is a genuinely impressive human being (and an inspired choice by the Trustees]. He said, “I’ve devoted my life to changing the world and I wasn’t looking to run a university, but when they approached me with this offer, I realized that if I could help train wonderful, brilliant kids to change the world, I could have an infinitely bigger impact on the world that by myself and so I’ve decided to devote my life with helping you to learn and grow so you can change the world.” Apparently, his speech sealed the deal for a lot of kids. It did for one of my college friend’s kids. When my son described it, it almost sounded like the love-bombing the Moonies used to do.</p>
<p>The visit would have sealed the deal for my son, but we met the next day with the head of disabilities services. He was a nice and thoughtful man, but in a sense, he was very circumspect about granting accommodations. He’d need extensive neuropsychological and/or medical data for each accommodation and had only recommended 15 waivers of the language requirement in his 3 years on the job. He said, “I have to maintain my credibility with the committee that decides this and I don’t want to sacrifice that for one student because the committee might not follow my recommendation for some other student who really needs it four years from now.” When we told him that my son had used scribes for longer papers (and SATs, etc.), he said, “I won’t rule it out but we’ve never done it. I’d need to look carefully at the neuropsych raw scores and I’ll need a letter from your doctor about the fatigue issues. But, I couldn’t commit to that now.” The mindset was that the prescribed curriculum was front and center and deviations from this were viewed with skepticism and had to be justified (sometimes at levels that I don’t think are possible).</p>
<p>So, my son had an inkling that Dartmouth might not be the right place for him even though it was fantastic and people were unbelievably nice and interesting and gues what, they loved, loved, loved it.</p>
<p>On to Amherst. Much less showy two day program. Amherst’s president was committed but seemed a bit stiff and answered questions like a politician by not answering questions and always returning to the stump speech. Dartmouth definitely won there. But, instead of being curriculum-centered, it is student-centered. There are no requirements, no language requirements, just a freshman seminar with a big focus on writing. Classes except for a few are 12 to 22 kids, taught only by professors. They involve the kids in their research. They really do have dinner with them. When we asked about accommodations, they said, “Scribes no problem, we pay for them. And note-takers and readers if you need them.” The attitude which one dean said, was “If we accept you, we’re going to do everything we can to make sure you succeed.” We’ll use the open curriculum to help you to balance courses so that you only have one heavy reading/writing course per semester. We’ll be looking out for you.</p>
<p>Then my son went to a spectacular class in constitutional law (an area of prime interest) from a recognized master teacher and a mediocre class with 15 students in international relations. Halfway through the meeting with the first dean (these meeting happened on day 2), he said, “I’m going here.” He said it is a little small (only twice the size of his HS) but that the small classes and intimate relationships with professors would be perfect for him. He said, “Dartmouth wins on style but Amherst wins on substance.” He also said, I loved my time at Dartmouth and would do OK there. I had an OK time at Amherst, but it is the best place for me." As is often, the case, I am impressed by his clarity of thought and analysis (especially since his conclusions are similar to mine).</p>
<p>Plus, the resources they throw behind their undergraduates are astounding. Before I visited, I thought it was the best choice for him and was the reason I dissuaded him from applying early decision to Brown. It was better than I thought.