<p>Hi everybody. I'm currently a junior in high school and I've been looking into what would be best for me college wise. I have a somewhat complex situation and plenty of questions, so stick with me here and hopefully we can get some good conversation going on.</p>
<p>I suppose my first question is this: how important is the prestige of the undergrad when applying to top tier law schools? My big goal in all of this is to go to Yale, Harvard, Stanford, or Columbia law school. This also ties into the question of how prestigious of an undergrad can I even get into? Currently I have a 3.95 GPA and 34 on the ACT (even though I'm still taking it as well as the SAT), as well as great extra curriculars. This is awesome and I'm happy to be blessed enough to have this, but I'm not sure how far it will get me because I am a white male from a public school in the midwest. I am the most typical majority student in America and unfortunately it greatly reduces my chances of getting in the Ivy League.</p>
<p>Anyway, I've researched a lot and I figure that if I were to early decision to Columbia University, I'd have at least a decent chance. I'm just really not sure if I should, for several reasons. First, it would cost me 80K more (after need-based financial aid) than just taking a full ride to a public school. Second, I'd have to work so much harder to get the 3.9 GPA I'm going to need for a top tier law school. Finally, it would leave me little time to do extra curriculars along with my undergrad because I'd have to work so hard studying. One thing I need to note here is that I'm not worried about working my butt off; I simply want to know if all that would even help my chances of getting into a top tier law school.</p>
<p>I know law schools mostly look at GPA and LSAT, so does it really matter if I get a 3.9 from U of A instead of Columbia? This leads me into my next question: how hard would it be to earn like a 3.9 from Columbia (or other Ivy Leagues)? I know it depends a lot on major and mine is going to be Computer Science. I'm sure it's going to be harder, but my brother thinks it's relatively impossible.</p>
<p>My next question is somewhat unrelated to the previous ones; my apologies. I got my 34 on the ACT without the writing section. If I were to take it again WITH the writing section and get like a 33, could I couple my separate writing score with my 34 instead of the lower score? I know the writing and regular portions are separate, but do the Ivy League schools that require the writing portion not even look at that score since I didn't take the writing portion with it? I'm hoping I can get a 34 again with the writing, or even better, but I don't know for sure that I can.</p>
<p>My last question I just thought of recently and it's made me rethink all of my previous research and things. I know lots of people get masters before going to Harvard Law or the equivalents. I was wondering if I should get a masters in Forensic Science or something instead of just a bachelors in Computer Science, because the former is more of what I'm interested in. So, do you think getting a masters would be worth the extra money and time?</p>
<p>I suppose that this post is already too long. If you bothered enough to read my whole story, then know that I really appreciate it. I will be checking this thread every day so please give me some good advice and help me out a little because I feel really overwhelmed. Again, thank you all for your time and Consideration.</p>