<p>
[quote]
1) Student-faculty ratio
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Here's the problem: colleges use total number of undergraduates divided by total number of faculty, despite the fact that faculty spends more time with grad students than undergrads, or at least shares them equally. If UChicago has 1100 professor in arts and science, 4400 undergrads, and 4400 graduate students, it will publish 4:1 ratio, although 8:1 gives a better indication.</p>
<p>Slide 8 of the powerpoint gives a good idea of National Universities Rice considers its peer school:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.professor.rice.edu/professor/Size.asp?SnID=194578800%5B/url%5D">http://www.professor.rice.edu/professor/Size.asp?SnID=194578800</a></p>
<p>Princeton: 7 to 1
Rice and Chicago: 8 to 1
Emory and Yale: 10 to 1
MIT, Harvard, and Brown: 11 to 1
Duke and Northwestern: 12 to 1
Stanford, Cornell, and Columbia: 13 to 1
Carnegie Mellon: 14 to 1
Johns Hopkins: 15 to 1</p>
<p>Note: Most top private national universities included. Caltech is 8 to 1 as well.</p>
<p>This doesn't really account for some faculty only doing researching, but is a better indicator than the numbers published by the college.</p>
<p>
[quote]
2) Percent of students going to graduate school
[/quote]
</p>
<p>For PhD, Grinnell's institutional research site gives good numbers
<a href="http://www.grinnell.edu/offices/institutionalresearch/reports/PhDProd_F06.pdf%5B/url%5D">http://www.grinnell.edu/offices/institutionalresearch/reports/PhDProd_F06.pdf</a></p>
<p>It gives overall PhD and PhD by subject area, ranked by percentage of graduates. In ranking the different subjects, it only gives those ranked 5 above and 5 below Grinnell, or the top 10.</p>
<p>Overall, it's:
1. Caltech
2. Harvey Mudd
3. Swarthmore
4. Reed
5. MIT
6. Carleton
7. Oberlin
8. Bryn Mawr
9. Chicago
10. Grinnell</p>
<p>(The rest are in that link)</p>
<p>
[quote]
3) Endowment divided by total number of students (ugrad and grad)
[/quote]
</p>
<p>The wikipedia site says it all. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_US_colleges_and_universities_by_endowment%5B/url%5D">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_US_colleges_and_universities_by_endowment</a></p>
<p>I would like to mention that Olin College of Engineering has $1.5 million per student in endowment, right between Harvard and Yale.</p>
<p>
[quote]
4) Average financial aid grant
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I think US News and World Report posted this on their website. Someone on CC linked it a while back, but I can't find it now.</p>
<p>
[quote]
5) Percent URM
[/quote]
</p>
<p>No idea. I think a community college in NYC has more URM than all the ivy leagues combined. URM form majorities. Perhaps look to historically black colleges.</p>
<p>I hope noone takes any of these rankings too seriously. It should give a general idea. Low faculty-staff ratio doesn't make the faculty good teachers. High graduate school could simply mean more people want to pursue PhD in the first place, or even perhaps because they couldn't find a job so they can only keep staying in school. Endowment doesn't mean the college spends all of it. Schools might be worse in financial aid because less poor student apply; all top colleges promise to meet full need.</p>