<p>scott523kim- The answer was egalitarian: affirming, promoting, or characterized by belief in equal political, economic, social, and civil rights for all people.</p>
<p>SECOND VERSION NOV. TEST. BLUE COVER</p>
<p>COMPILATION:</p>
<p>SC:
hubris
seminal
intransigent
given to…platitude</p>
<p>Passages:
characterization of Maria: extremely naive
mantle=appearance
environmentalist activism motivated by anger
fifth, seventh, and ninth grade ==> different experience</p>
<p>@dlightextract</p>
<p>environmentalist question I remember:
-Which is the best example of citizen/scientist “thinking with two hats” (something like that)? and the choices were: the biologist promoting policies to protect chimps or the congressman passing a policy to preserve forests (I’m not sure)</p>
<p>for CR who remembers the “The reactions to the designer’s new fashion show were starkly __<strong><em>: either disparaging or _</em></strong>.” and some choices were like “salubrious…inane” (wrong), “incontrovertible…tenuous”, something with “adulatory” etc.?</p>
<p>need to discuss:
hard to deny TV to children?? </p>
<p>was the first environmental passage “accepting a trend”?</p>
<p>i feel dumb looking back…i put video games/toys for kids as “source of strength” =(</p>
<p>dlightextract - there’s another thread for you guys. go there</p>
<p>dlightextract what was the question to that motivated by anger one and the question. i rememeber they were comparing that passage on envionmentalism to people in this same field getting involved with politics</p>
<p>its adulatory i think</p>
<p>Another vocab question was endemic</p>
<p>@inflore</p>
<p>i put biologies promoting policies to protect chimps</p>
<p>and aslo i put antithetical…adulatory</p>
<p>@ caizzacuz17 </p>
<p>i don’t remember the question…=/</p>
<p>SECOND VERSION NOV. TEST. BLUE COVER</p>
<p>COMPILATION:</p>
<p>SC:
hubris
seminal
intransigent
given to…platitude
antithetical…adulatory</p>
<p>Passages:
characterization of Maria: extremely naive
mantle=appearance
environmentalist activism motivated by anger
fifth, seventh, and ninth grade ==> different experience</p>
<p>Japanese girl one
first-The primary focus of the passage -Changed perception
second- what happens when tsumani yells at the dog- Maria is surprised
third- what does it mean by ocean-She lost something that is irrreplaceable
fourth- why does Maria mention the times- to get a meaningful point across
fifth-Tusanami’s tone when she talks to maria-indigant rebuke
sixth-Tsumani’s opinion about maria-extremely naive
seventh-maria feels something for tsunami-she finally understands tsunami</p>
<p>Thats all I know from my experience</p>
<p>Does anybody remember the sentence completion where the answer was either comprehensive or unoriginal? I had it narrowed to those two and I don’t remember what I guessed.</p>
<p>SECOND VERSION NOV. TEST. BLUE COVER</p>
<p>COMPILATION:</p>
<p>SC:
hubris
seminal
intransigent
given to…platitude
antithetical…adulatory</p>
<p>Passages:
characterization of Maria: extremely naive
The primary focus of the passage -Changed perception
what does it mean by ocean-She sees herself losing something that is irrreplaceable
why does Maria mention the times- to articulate a meaningful point across
Tusanami’s tone when she talks to maria-indigant rebuke
maria feels something for tsunami-she finally understands tsunami
previous thought of tsunami: never exprienced loss.
mantle=appearance
environmentalist activism motivated by anger
fifth, seventh, and ninth grade ==> different experience</p>
<p>i dont remember the question but answers choices were consternation, obstruction, and euphoria. what is the answer for this?</p>
<p>CrzyGmer789X2: I’m pretty sure it was unoriginal, the sentence talked about how the essay basically restated well known facts or something.</p>
<p>hard to deny TV to children or tangible materialistic values?? </p>
<p>was the first environmental passage “accepting a trend” and the second passage taking it with caution??</p>
<p>ycm, it was “complicity in” the embezzlement.</p>
<p>I think it is “hard to deny TV to children” because it were talks about how physically adults can take books away from children but not TV. </p>
<p>And I think that accepting a trend choice was right.</p>