<p>The authoritative regime gave more rights to the “adversaries” of the opposite party, but they were still not “inclined” to participate politically. </p>
<p>No_audio your ignoring the point that is being made. There’s no logic behind the idea that the authoritative regime would give more rights to elites of the opposing party. An Authoritative regime would not give any rights to any party opposing it. Hence, it’s adversaries of the opposing parties which are basically people that agree with the authoratitive regime itself.</p>
<p>i also remember fecundity being an answer for a sentence completion.
something about fish and reproduction.
i get the feeling this may be an experimental section though because it had a double passage but the 20min verbal also had a double section.</p>
<p>i guarantee that if you write down the question exactly as you remember it, CrossTheUniverse, you’ll see that although “adversaries” may make sense (and it doesn’t), “inclined” does not. reread my explanation if you don’t get it.</p>
<p>I’m tired of arguing about this problem. It all depends on what the sentence was, even though I’m pretty sure it said “The authoritative regime gave rights to the _____ of the opponent party”. @tbonus: yeah I remember most of those. I got most of those answers.</p>
<p>But was “elite”, in the context of the sentence, supposed to be contrasted with “rank-and-file”? I don’t think it was. I think the compensation was awarded to the whatevers in the first blank. And yes, it does matter that stalwarts are faithful members of a group. Those who adhere to a political ideology are resolute in their opinions and are thus rank-and-file members.</p>
<p>tbonus From what I remember I got the same answers. I may not have put the same thing for the question referring to lines 7-9 but I’m not positive. Overall I didn’t think the Machu Picchu passage was too bad. Fuel cells, however…</p>
<p>hmm lets see…fuel cells, there were multiple “how would ___ respond to ___” questions. i know for sure one of them is that the author of passage 1 would say that the cost in passage 2 is not as important as the economic independence of the States.</p>
<p>I wasn’t sure if they compared battery powered vs. gas powered. Cuz they only mention it once. I put, it was one of the reasons it has a promising future cuz the other goes on providing more examples.</p>