<p>fmpak, do you remember what the sentences were for “menacing…audacity” and “something…abashed.” And yes, I got confound for one. something about scientific data I think</p>
<p>blue, do you remember what sentence went with unnerved?</p>
<p>which question did the languorous answer belong too? and what were the other choices??</p>
<p>Can confirm posthumously, miscellany, feasible…monetary, eclectic, and languorous. What was the sentence for menacing…audacity? And I put extrapolate instead of confound, but not sure.</p>
<p>Also, distrust and derivation were two of the easier SCs.</p>
<p>The answer is definitely renegade.
a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another
an individual who rejects lawful or conventional behavior</p>
<p>feasible…monetary was one</p>
<p>For the Caribbean one I put [something] and dynamic…</p>
<p>sorry mapleleaf, i can barely remember the words haha</p>
<p>I confirm posthumously, miscellany, eclectic, and languorous</p>
<p>The author of the first passage described the idea that academics went first as lovable but violated and ridiculous, so using synonyms, it was appealing but ludicrous.</p>
<p>Haha no worries</p>
<p>And crzygmer, I can confirm those</p>
<p>Did anyone get “childish” for one? I thought that sounded way too obvious, but that was one of the earlier ones so…</p>
<p>which one do you guys think was the experimental section? I hope it is the first one about echolocation…</p>
<p>@fmpak93
menacing…audacity
posthumously
miscellany
something…monetary
confound? <–was that even a choice?
soemthing…abashed
eclectic
languorous</p>
<p>more??? plz addd</p>
<p>it cant be audacity. that means bold. Menacing did not people bold. </p>
<p>i agree with your other ones
and i got uncomprehending for about the scientist who didn’t like the zoologist’s claim about bat hearing.</p>
<p>neglible?
digression?
i remember something…trepidation, i didnt pick it though</p>
<p>dont remember the questions</p>
<p>@prospect8 I agree the answer was baleful and something else.</p>
<p>Was it baleful…trepidation? Both sound familiar but I can’t remember if they were the same sentence. I can also confirm childish.</p>
<p>Any consolidated list so far?</p>
<p>ADD QUESTIONS/ ANSWERS ONTO THIS PLEASE.</p>
<p>convenient, partisan+bias, dimunition, evocation… </p>
<p>2 short passages:
“that’s correct”: to conceed with previous solution
both about the increasing population
author2’s response to line X-X in passage 1: arguing that using technology to produce high-yielding crop can also achive the goal stated in passage 1 by using the chemicals.
relation: the passage 1 offers a solution, while passage 2 talk an alternative version of that solution (not the exact wording)</p>
<p>Passage about Caribbean Culture:
Government: motivated by commercial motives rather than cultural one
why talk about family and language? – To show a paradox set of attitudes
family: flexible and inclusive
language: tenacious and dynamic
a example of “cultural penetration”: idolization of Hollywood fimls by Japanese teenagers
—need reassesement</p>
<p>short passage:
- Settlement: --to have an engagement
- Woman is characterized by what? sides —complex character. I choose modest expection, not sure.
- The passage is about what? --his goal
- Fuction like? – an advisor</p>
<p>Passage about new farmhouse:
Newer farmhouses: --are enhanced by attractive surrounding/ offer the view of the countryside(The passage says: it did not took advantage of the out-side door)
the talk between “me” and father: part of ritual
parenthestical one : lack of irony or self-consciousness
my attitudes change: nostalgia to indifference
final question(Number 15): They are both attentive to what the other think.</p>
<p>Passage about quantum physics:
the final paragraph: not sure about two answers: show the intellectual effects of a physicist/ show how visualization changes the working style of a quantum physcist.</p>
<p>Passage about deception:
differences between 2 authors: Author1 hold a more accepting attitude toward deception
passage 1 and 2 differs greatly in: E: Author 2 talks about the immoral…
shattered?-- discomfort encountered by physicists
at the beginning: could/ should say: conceivable vs beneficial
calculations=? I choose plans
What do the author 1 and 2 do at the final paragraph of their passages? -Make generalizations about the nature of lying?
Line 56-58 lying makes them habitualize to deception and their brain atrophies–I choose lying … the fuction of … can not remeber it.
The attitude show in the ()about red light: nonchalant
Compared to author1, author2s tone is more…Humorous, analytical, judgemental
. I choose humorous, not sure.</p>
<p>prospect is probably right about the ques, i dont know half the vocab i pick. um let see</p>
<p>the plumage of the bird of paradise… was it about the color of the feather or the sound?</p>
<p>i got childish.</p>
<p>the court one. the judge or something’s life was far from ___<strong><em>; for her appeals she had to make _</em></strong> preparations
quiescent…exacting?</p>
<p>what was the context for menacing…audacity?</p>
<p>langorous: a man being listless was the context.</p>
<p>
Yes, though I’m not entirely sure if they were in that order or switched.</p>
<p>
Put this, too.</p>
<p>was quiescent…something an answer?</p>