<p>I’m starting to think maybe there were more than 2 versions of today’s test, because my topics were:</p>
<p>monarch butterflies
venice
visting wife’s old house</p>
<p>and one more I can’t remember… did anyone else get these?!</p>
<p>Did anyone else have passages about a brick house and quantum physics? My friend seems to have a completely different test than everyone else I’ve talked to.</p>
<p>****. I put summarize/reiterate. What was the answer?</p>
<p>go to the other discussion board. there were 2 forms for the test</p>
<p>graceful, I put the same. </p>
<p>And I also put “Transcending Human Perspective.”</p>
<p>^^same, the transcending human perspective one I’m sure about.</p>
<p>Yeah, what was the one about the purpose of the last paragraph of the college athletes? I forget what I put, but I didn’t put reiterate…</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it was shift arguments. One paragraph started with “first,” the next with “second,” and both were counterarguments. Then he talked about how we need to focus on getting our priorities right with college athletes vs. reiterating why they shouldn’t be paid.</p>
<p>Wait a second which passage was the reiterate question for?</p>
<p>was the one with the girl the girl who can elucidate “similarities” and “incongruous”???</p>
<p>it was the college athlete one. how she said first–where does the paying stop? second–something. i thot it was shift the argument because she ends up bringing up the point about how $$ should go to academics.</p>
<p>yeah I put similarities and incongruous.
so was the shifting argument one choice A?</p>
<p>Yeah, I don’t think he was reiterating his argument or doing anything with a counterargument. Was there a choice about talking about a new aspect of his argument? Because I think that’s what I chose.</p>
<p>Edit: I put shift the argument</p>
<p>Yeah I put presenting new evidence but I might be wrong…</p>
<p>I don’t think I got “similarities” and “incongruous.” What were the other choices, or what was the context of the sentence, if anyone remembers?</p>
<p>I also put similarity/incongruous.</p>
<p>And I’m saying that the first couple paragraphs were counterarguments, which contrasts with the 3rd. Therefore, it was a shift in the speaker’s topic or w/e. Choice A.</p>
<p>Thank god. how many do you guys have wrong so far?
And what do you think the curve’s gonna be?</p>
<p>SC:
I got mosaic for one, dispute
@liyinxinhua
“that’s right” I don’t know what answer choice you mean by “to conceed with previous solution” but I put whatever it was that had something like “acknowledging there might be surprise” b/c he made a rather controversial claim.
For author2 to author 1 in X-X I think it was that the focus should be not the “widespread use of chemicals, but the effective use”.</p>
<p>I put complex character, because the last sentence and the sentence before that described the woman as having multiple sides.</p>
<p>I put showed how visualization affects a quantum physicist, since rolling around etc. doesn’t really show intellectual effects.</p>
<p>For the humorous one I put flippant. It’s not more analytical, it’s not judgmental, and i didn’t think humorous, it certainly wasn’t tentative. Thus, flippant sort of made sense, because it was more disrespectful to morality</p>
<p>we should get a list going…i think the list kind of died >.<</p>
<p>I think I put similarity/incongruous but there was another answer that I almost put.
Can anyone remind me what the incensed question was?</p>
<p>CrazyGmer, incensed was asking how you would characterize the scientists response when he grabs the other guy and says something like “surely we can’t actually mean that bats do what we haven’t even perfected with our cutting edge technology.”</p>
<p>I put pretentious but I’m probably wrong.</p>