I’ve no idea why swimming competitively should even be worth mentioning compared to being competitive in academic competitions, seeing as how swimming offers no substantive contributions to society and frankly doesn’t demonstrate any unique qualities you couldn’t find out of, say, the robotics team - winning the IMO or even an essay writing contest probably require even more hard work and discipline than swimming, and clearly greater aptitude that is relevant to university.
Charities and leadership positions are more substantive, but frankly a lot of “well rounded” activities are just resume padding techniques.
RMIB, I.m not sure you understand the full range of things kids can get involved in and how those can show a breadth and depth, willingness, adaptability, perspective and more. You keep focusing on depth in one field. And stats or something hierarchical, like winning over others. And you apparently don’t understand the efforts put into swim team and what sports, in general, can represent.
Don’t be fearful of “well rounded.” It’s a good thing, as long as the efforts aren’t some scattered list of whatevers.
This isn’t so much about getting into a most competitive because you were a great student in your hs, HRSMom. It’s about showing what they feel will make you a great college student. And great isn’t solely measured in college GPA.
@lookingforward not sure if that last part was for me, as I didn’t comment on being a great hs student, or getting into a competitive school. I agree with what you are saying. No argument here!