<p>I have 530 posts and 115 threads. Is that like the highest thread to post ratio on the site? LOL</p>
<p>edit:</p>
<p>116 now haha</p>
<p>Well, Roger Dooley has 10,143 threads and 4,043 posts.
So it would appear that his thread to post ratio is greater than 1. O_O</p>
<p>Yeah, nobody can beat Roger's but you had better look for smallest ratio.
I bet there are people with 1000+ posts and 0 threads. :)</p>
<p>InquilineKea has Threads: 457 Posts: 895</p>
<p>you're no where near many people.</p>
<p>if you want to have a high thread to post ratio....start posting random and pointless threads while your still young...they will add up. :)</p>
<p>SAKKY HAS LIKE 3 THREADS AND 6,000 BILLION POSTS.</p>
<p>^
that deserved all caps =P</p>
<p>Edit: sorry, I mean, 8,500 posts and 20 threads</p>
<p>omg.. i have to beat that...therefore i need like 40,000 posts....</p>
<p>IK creates threads just for the sake of creating threads, which you don't do quite as often. Only some of yours are totally nonsensical, rather than all.</p>
<p>Are you talking to me? I never post threads :(</p>
<p>No, I'm talking to the OP.</p>
<p>okey dokey then!</p>
<p>How nonsensical are my threads? On a scale of 1 to 10.</p>
<p>1.7 . u?</p>
<p>^ 6/10. Most of your threads are nonsensical. Kudos.</p>
<p>most of my threads? search me.. i don't really make threads.</p>