<p>Does anyone remember any questions from the native american passage?</p>
<p>Or rather, is it not that the kinds of demands and expectations placed before both aristocrats and women–the amount of time necessarily devoted to social functions, the very kinds of activities demanded–simply made total devotion to profession out of the question, indeed unthinkable, both for upper-class males and for women generally, rather than its being a question of genius and talent?</p>
<p>hello! “amount of time necessarily devoted… simply made TOTAL DEVOTION to profession out of the question”</p>
<p>he’s saying that they don’t have the time because of their social status… implying that it takes time (that they don’t have) to be an artist! </p>
<p>full time endeavor is right. the social thing was not worded in a way that made sense in the passage. im positive.</p>
<p>for the answer social status/full-time endeavor, may I ask what is the exact question as phrased ?</p>
<p>I said earlier that devotion to something doesn’t mean that you use your entire time. You can be completely devoted to God, but that doesn’t mean you sit in a church all day and pray/read the bible. You can be fully devoted to art and yet only draw something for one hour a day. The passage is saying that they had no time whatsoever to do anything; this does not mean that being an artist takes up all of their time. You can be an artist and full devoted and go to some social events. </p>
<p>The problem is that you are using your interpretation as an answer when one of the answers is directly embedded in the text. The social answer is directly stated, while artistry being a full time endeavor isn’t directly stated.</p>
<p>“By some mysterious circumstance, later artists were from pastoral backgrounds as well [sic]” </p>
<p>^The SAT asked whether the author’s tone in this sentence was</p>
<p>wry
inquisitive
…</p>
<p>there were obviously three more options but I don’t remember what they were; I chose wry because I think she was implying something with “mysterious circumstance”–I don’t think she really believed it was mere circumstance, in other words.</p>
<p>can we debate the double zen passage one?</p>
<ul>
<li>Completely agree or partially agree?</li>
</ul>
<p>I put completely but now I think thats too extrem.</p>
<ul>
<li>Title - Feast before you (or sth similar)</li>
</ul>
<p>I put something like unthinkable mistake or something</p>
<p>what u guys get?</p>
<p>It was not partially agree. No where in the passage did the author change the overall tone of the passage. He did not present any counterexamples to what he was saying.</p>
<p>just wanted to know the exact question</p>
<p>Completely agree is the right choice imo. It’s exactly the same he would say. </p>
<p>Fest before you is def the right answer. No doubt bout that.</p>
<p>I thought about putting partially agree, but the next question about having the “feast” thing from the 2nd passage be the title of the first, I figured that it would be completely agree.</p>
<p>What was the quesiton for the 2nd indian question?
I put that good memory is needed for the ceremonies.
The last sentence only said something along the lines of “Without this good memory, they would not have been able to participate in all those ceremonies”</p>
<p>For the nikhil passage, was the answer “to introduce a shift in the narrative” or to “introduce a new character”?</p>
<p>oh sweet I didn’t do as crappy as I thought lol</p>
<p>wat bout 33. historical speculation for that geolgy/atlas one</p>
<p>Did anyone else put that? I think another ansrew was that the dude who created that mapping thing was predicting the future of science</p>
<p>one question about sleeping: what exactly did the passage mention about labor unions? can anyone remember?</p>
<p>I put to introduce a shift in the narrative. I don’t remember wat the question was though lol</p>
<p>did passage mention something like labor unions will seek to improve the situation/ or to add oil to fire?</p>
<p>can someone help me on this?
What was the quesiton for the 2nd indian question?
I put that good memory is needed for the ceremonies.
The last sentence only said something along the lines of “Without this good memory, they would not have been able to participate in all those ceremonies”</p>
<p>132 ur right I got that one too</p>
<p>^ That one was confusing. I don’t even remember what I put.</p>
<p>can someone give me the context of the nakhil’s attitude one.
the one where we’re debating if it’s “unintentional”</p>