<p>Definitely resolute. 
That essay ending was in no way “triumphant”.
& yeah I’m so weirded out by the balanced vs. emphatic one. 
As for the insight into the author’s character: I didn’t put that, and I am pretty positive it wasn’t that. I also thought that one until I saw it said AUTHOR’s character, not Kael’s. But i don’t think I remember a reflection on writing being a choice though, but if it was I probably got that question wrong…does anyone remember the other choices for that question?</p>
<p>check out post 957 pls.</p>
<p>Also, some one did not answer this question before: </p>
<p>IS the choice with the “existing communitieis” a different one from “irreversible effects of natural ecosystems” choice or something like that?</p>
<p>may we have a new consolidated list svp? thanks!</p>
<p>Wait, I’m fairly certain eclectic and unremitting weren’t in the same question.</p>
<p>The one with unremitting was about a girl who trained unceasingly but still wasn’t able to win or something</p>
<p>**
**</p>
<p>someone confirm?</p>
<p>Gah I put a beautifully written poem lacking depth for the Oscar Wilde question. I interpreted what Wilde said as “anybody could play accurately (well), but I play with emotion” Gah looks like I’ll be back on December.</p>
<p>i also agree that the end of the essay was resolute not triumphant.</p>
<p>Eclectic and unremitting were two different questions. The eclectic question was a single blank that also had assiduous as an option.</p>
<p>i put triumphant. it is unanimous that resolute is correct?</p>
<p>i think i put resolute.</p>
<p>eclectic and assiduous were in the question about the many varied doctors and multi-specialists or whatever. I put eclectic but was it actually assiduous?</p>
<p>Sentence Completions
-Decorum…
-prolific…trenchant
-retiring…penchant
-slovenly
-ecletic
-unremitting
-mudslinging
-permeate
-decorum
-traversing…wealth
-reconciliating…enmity
-benign
-illicit
-elephants…thriving</p>
<p>Passage About Jumping Rope
-Parents habits were predictable
-confidence
-vibrant and well being for the helix
-ice skater</p>
<p>Passage about Trojan War
-homer’s works were the most reliable
-magna carta question…to vividly portray the time gap between the writings?
-uniform most nearly means unanimous
-probably did occur because there was no evidence against it
-some celebrate events are not verified
-paradox because people firmly believe in something without evidence</p>
<p>Movie Critic
-first few lines sugesst that the narrator has admiration for Kael
-Whom would it offend? - Discerning Moviegoers
-Oscar wilde - artfully written biography with factual errors
-lively and compelling for the question about the ‘fizz’
-hacked down means critize vigorously
-passage suggest there was disagreement over her work
-for question with 2 people, she wasn’t the only one that preferred less ornate writing
-something about colloquial
- the personal anecdote showed insight into her character OR “uses the anecdote to set up the rest of the paragraph”
-resolute</p>
<p>Rewilding
-well-founded
-inevtable
-coping with problems and not finding solutions
- Passage 1 would think the last part of Passage 2 (the suggestions about what to do with the money) was inadequate.
- Passage 2 would think the conservationists mentioned in Passage 1 (who had concerns about impacts of rewilding) - well-founded.
- Last part of passage 2 - suggesting alternatives.
- concession leading to rebuttal
- Something about the cheetah in P1 and mammoth in P2 - both are extinct.
- The situation with the camel in rewilding - unable to live in the nonnative environment.
- Most important concern about rewilding raised in P2 - that the proxy species could irreversibly impact the native species and their ecological system?</p>
<p>Funding of radio short passage
-harming the function of america’s democracy or something.
-analogy
-passage 1 was more emphatic
-passage 2 makes points, and passage 2 presents conflicting views</p>
<p>Log Cabin Short Passage
-antidote
-shortlived</p>
<p>was “illicit” one of the answers for the sentence completions because i dont remember seeing that word. O_O. i believe someone mentioned this in some earlier section of this thread.</p>
<p>"Why is this one correct?
-probably did occur because there was no evidence against it</p>
<p>^I put probably did not occur because there is little literature documenting it or something to that effect."
Probably did occur is the correct answer because in the last sentence of the passage or so, the author writes that the Trojan War was an event incapable of proof or something like that. </p>
<p>"For the question with the three people and the author… Was the answer “She was not unique”? "
I put that all of them shied away from ornate language.</p>
<p>So…
triumphant vs. resolute??? any one else?
I thought the use of italics and exclamation mark made the sentence excited; the author was triumphant in getting to the clincher… But I could see resolute as being correct, too.</p>
<p>it was definitely eclectic.</p>
<p>@Takayu I’m pretty sure it was eclectic, sorry if I confused you. I just said it was the question that had assiduous as another answer because that’s just how I remembered it.</p>
<p>Hey guys what is 0-2 wrong and 2 ommited… And also I agree that it was passage 1 and Homer instead
Of archealogy</p>
<p>@Jolly: It was two other critics, and yes. She was not unique because others also preferred a less ornate style.</p>
<p>elephants was a different question than thriving.</p>