<p>I am in S’pore… really gotta go… gd morning (lol…)</p>
<p>The popcorn question? Was the answer 1 or 4?</p>
<p>Hey people…help with m-t-d thing? where should it ring a bell?</p>
<p>I have only 1200 one wrong in math as far as I get it. I for some reson decided that there were 6 hours from 13 to 18. >.<</p>
<p>I remember elusive, because he tried to make a blockbuster multiple times, ergo, he found it elusive. </p>
<p>The teacher attitude of the writer towards Charlie is correct. I chose meticulous for Charlie’s attitude. </p>
<p>The author showed recognition of guilt or fear of punishment
The woman spoke to children as she was comfortable with them
Yes on both. </p>
<p>Yes on the probing. He was satisfied he didn’t let the interviewer get what he wanted or something along those lines.
For Frost I think I only remember one other: that the interviewer’s thesis was confirmed.</p>
<p>I put Charlie’s actions were humorously skeptical; he was sort of poking fun about the stones thing, not really offensive.</p>
<p>As for the Japanese women, I put recognition of guilt; nothing in the passage suggested that she would get punished, but she anticipitated that the women she stole the box off her was watching her or w/e.</p>
<p>Does versality ring bell?
elusive or tenable?
neophyte or debutant?</p>
<p>Humorously skeptical is correct. The author assumed he would put a stone in a glass of water (to disprove her statement that rocks dissolve).</p>
<p>Definitely neophyte</p>
<p>And i chose versatility for that amazon explorer passage</p>
<p>Recognition of guilt, yeah. “one of these days she was going to be good for a week.”
The father was disapproving of his wife’s actions but sympathizing with her wish.
I chose versatility for one, but I am not sure which.
Elusive is correct, I believe.</p>
<p>versatility, elusive, neophyte…</p>
<p>and for the girl on making a decision and immediately regretting it…</p>
<p>the neophyte section is not scored…</p>
<p>
>______________<
goddamit
I put E there, that the suspections were undermined…because I didn’t remember what undermine meant…or to be more honest, though it was opposite of what it is.</p>
<p>And in the double passage about public opinion there was this question which i dont really remember but the options were something like :
Exaggerated
Will ultimately prove wrong</p>
<p>Writing section QS# 30</p>
<p>School children were taught lessons that the farmer was a great scientiest but only remembering him for the peanuts etc etc ?</p>
<p>Ring a bell?</p>
<p>joshuakitty, I am in S’pore… really gotta go… gd morning (lol…) </p>
<p>@ haha. Get thee to bed. It’s LATE!</p>
<p>elaborate on m-t-d please? please??</p>
<p>Writing section QS# 30</p>
<p>School children were taught lessons that the farmer was a great scientiest but only remembering him for the peanuts etc etc ?</p>
<p>Ring a bell? </p>
<p>yeah, but I don’t remember which one I chose.</p>
<p>x + t = m
hence
x = m - t</p>
<p>if you subtract d from it so x = m - t - d</p>
<p>I am really trying hard to remember what the m-t-d was about, but I can’t :S Sorryy.</p>
<p>Oh…I have that one correct.</p>
<p>So, so far…1 mistake in math and 2 mistakes in CR is all that I found.</p>