<p>CR</p>
<ol>
<li>Kill Joy</li>
<li>Recondite</li>
<li>Pride</li>
<li>Eccentric</li>
</ol>
<p>hitthebooks1994: yes.</p>
<p>Some people are saying that the answer to the pollution problem was .38 bc you had to substitute 80 instead of 80,000,000</p>
<p>i dont know i think it was dull and boring because the movement did not make good work</p>
<p>aren’t experiemental sections supposed to be harder?</p>
<p>the indian grandma one was easy T_T</p>
<p>Was the question about Thoreau about Walden? The author saw Walden as human-centered, but I think something in the passage indicated that he wrote some scientifically oriented stuff too.</p>
<p>I got “call for an alternative” as well.</p>
<p>was it .38 or .9? some one say definitively</p>
<p>Thoreau was fundamentally human oriented, the question it asked was why live?</p>
<p>@hopeful2013
I got “proposing a hypothetical solution” or something along those lines. There was no other suggested course of action, so there couldn’t have been an alternative.</p>
<p>What was the answer to the one with ab >10^5 </p>
<p>( a + 1/ b ) /
5a
?</p>
<p>^^ yea I got call for alternative.</p>
<p>I put call for an alternative but then again I wasn’t focused the whole time on that passage because I was mad that I didn’t get to finish the math before it ._.</p>
<p>I really hope it was 0.9</p>
<p>I substituted 80 in and got ~90%</p>
<p>YES YES YES!!! REVERIECE EXACTLY!!! the same exact thing, that had to be the experimental section because it was SOOO hard in compared to the last 2 I took</p>
<p>it wasn’t call for an alternative because there was no alternative to be called. I almost made that same mistake</p>
<p>1/5 = .2</p>
<p>Lim a,b —> infinity</p>
<p>It was definitely 90%. the ab > 10^5 was 0.2.</p>
<p>what was the question about call for the alternative and hypothesis thing?
was it something about answering the primary purpose of the quote?
i think i put call for the alternative…?</p>