<p>For the Pollution One:</p>
<p>Was it a grid in or multiple choice? </p>
<p>The answer was 90 right? Not .9 </p>
<p>Cause it asked what percent of the pollution could be removed. So its 90 percent. You grid 90 right?</p>
<p>I said alternative.</p>
<p>I was torn between vehement and caustic and I chose caustic. Wasn’t sure about that question.</p>
<p>The 1/5 problem was ab > 10^5</p>
<p>(a + 1/b)/5ab</p>
<p>Or something like that.</p>
<p>I put caustic why was it vehement not caustic?</p>
<p>Her solution was radical, thus she was calling for an alternative approach.</p>
<p>Hypothesizing a proposal makes even less sense. She wasn’t hypothesizing at all, she calling. The language was urgent.</p>
<p>@hopeful2013, there were two different questions.
One was about the tone of the two paragraphs, the choices were emphatic and fatalistic. The answer was emphatic.</p>
<p>The second was about the tone of a specific part of the second passage, and the choices I was torn on were vehement and caustic. I think it was caustic though…</p>
<p>vehement is too extreme…</p>
<p>@ hoghpeaksdrifter I did have one like that…did not think it was that hard be probably the hardest of the CR</p>
<p>Math had to have been experimental, that was rediculous</p>
<p>I think the pollution was a multiple choice question because I remember getting 89 with some decimals.</p>
<p>roommate passage:
killjoy
unconscious
pride
eccentric
disappointment (?)</p>
<p>thoreau:
fundamentally human centered
gains and losses</p>
<p>woman civil rights leader (Baker):
call for alternative (?)
account for phenomenon
shaping
consider carefully (or something like that) (meaning of weighing)
handling </p>
<p>vocab (not in order)
fickleness
recondite
mercurial
exacerbate
ameliorate</p>
<p>It is 100% vehement.</p>
<p>did anyone put CAUSTIC instead of VEHEMENT???</p>
<p>The experimental is the section that you have 4 of - you’re supposed to have three of each plus one extra
I had four math, so one of them was the experimental
math question that asked about a number thats a multiple of 10 and 24 and is a perfect square- was it 3600?</p>
<p>pretty sure it was vehement - caustic has too negative of a connotation. </p>
<p>@notanengineer answer = .2</p>
<p>its caustic… they were criticizing</p>
<p>vehement is too extreme</p>
<p>Flaming it was MC for the 20 minute section</p>
<p>^hopeful2013, I meant there was no original solution to be had so it must have been hypothetical solution. Also was it spy or archaeologist?</p>
<p>I don’t know what was vehement about that paragraph.</p>
<p>Emphatic was in a question addressing both passages as a hole. Vehement/caustic were about a specific paragraph in passage 2.</p>
<p>The pollution problem was MC, and answer was 90.</p>
<p>what was the answer to the grid in question about exercise and what fraction of the exercise time the guy walked</p>
<p>i think it was caustic</p>
<p>roommate passage:
killjoy
unconscious
pride
eccentric
disappointment (?)</p>
<p>thoreau:
fundamentally human centered
gains and losses</p>
<p>woman civil rights leader (Baker):
call for alternative (?)
account for phenomenon
shaping
consider carefully (or something like that) (meaning of weighing)
handling </p>
<p>vocab (not in order)
fickleness
recondite
mercurial
exacerbate (… maybe assail, there is debate)
ameliorate
recondite
faculty / emotion</p>